DD-can you elaborate a bit further on where you are going with"what if Marilyn and her daughter weren't telling the truth?"
It would appear on the surface that because these witnesses came forward and openly shared their identities, they weren't afraid or acting out of fear.
But isn't it possible they were doing just that, for one of two reasons?
1. They saw something that night, they know the killer (known or unknown to them) knows they saw something, and, afraid for themselves, they are going on the record to say, "We didn't see anything that night."
2. They know the killer and, afraid he will be caught, they are going on the record to say, "We didn't see anything that night."
Isn't it odd that there was such a crowd gathered at a small gas station that had been closed for half an hour late at night in a small, sleepy town where an abduction and double murder can happen on its streets without any witnesses seeing anything?
Isn't it odd that a witness who
may have heard the murders taking place that night was afraid to come forward for the better part of a year, and even then her identity was kept secret, while the last people to see the victims alive, possibly minutes before the murders, were open about their identities?
As CoolJ reminded us, Ozark is a small town.
If the killer was unknown to the witnesses, didn't the witnesses willingly enter into a "relationship" of sorts with the killer when they came forward and shared their identities? Why weren't they afraid to do so?
Isn't it possible they weren't afraid because there was nothing to be afraid of?
If they already knew the killer's identity, and he knew theirs, what did they have to be afraid of as long as they were saying, "We didn't see anything"?