Ok. Yes. I was looking for other employment locally besides truck driving. Fast food, golf courses, country clubs, etc. anything additional
Its only been made public about the truck driving and he has been doing that since the AF
Ok. Yes. I was looking for other employment locally besides truck driving. Fast food, golf courses, country clubs, etc. anything additional
If his family was there I would consider it his home. Truck driving definitely gives him freedom and some familiarity with other areas. He is expected to be gone. If he is guilty and committed other crimes not doing them close to his home would keep him under the radar.
If you felt guilty about murder would it bother you to see where you committed the crime?
Anyone can have a family somewhere and it not be "home" to them. I'm a lesbian and before I came out "home" wasn't "home" until I was accepted by my family. There was always a difference in shark as a person with friends or alone vs shark with family. So it is very possible that his address and home where to totally different things. I had an address with my family but I was home with my friends. If that makes sense.
It obviously hasn't bothered him for 20 years. And to play devils advocate, if and that's a big if he didn't kill the girls he knows something and has known for 20 years. Even if he had a sort of relationship with JB (which I do not believe he did) he has sat on that information for years, information that could have discarded the DNA evidence and allowed LE to focus on other aspects of the case (not saying that the DNA is the only thing they have on him, because I believe they have more than just DNA) so to me if he's not the actual person who pulled the trigger, he is just as guilty.
Thanks for the post. You may be right I do not know who committed this crime but wanted to raise my concerns about DNA genealogy because I think it is relevant in this case and if this man is guilty it will be proved in a court of law. If DNA genealogy is as scientifically sound as the way it has been presented it should be able to withstand questions asked by one poster from a long way away. Thanks as always for your interest.
Are you of the opinion he, or the guilty party acted alone?
Thanks for the post I did say I was not going to post that much more on this subject but it is very interesting and important a mans life is at stake who I believe is very likely innocent. My opinion is the processes and processes used to check the DNA are likely flawed. The DNA is 'mistreated' by being entered into may to many systems and also that the genealogists at the moment are more often than not identifying the wrong suspect because their techniques are not scientific. Hence I believe the Golden State Killer was Germanic but incorrect Italian family trees were used. To put in simple terms it is flawed and not scientific. These are backed up by my own research into certain cases. Thanks for the interest.
Look I'm sure you have watched a crime show or two but unless you have a degree in crime scene investigation and many years experience on the job, I wouldn't say that you're better or more experience than someone who does this everyday on the job. I get that you can misidentify with genealogy BUT they THEN compared his DNA with the DNA at the crime scene and it was a DIRECT MATCH, not a guess of a group of people. His DNA is NOT going to directly match anyone else. You use the genealogy JUST to get an IDEA, Then send the person and crime scene to the state lab to see if it DIRECTLY MATCHES and ...........IT DID!! Now let's see who actually believes it was consensual. IF it was consensual then he should've came forward 20 years ago to fill in some blanks. There's no way you can get me to believe it was consensual WHATSOEVER!!Thanks for the post. In all of the crimes here I am very sorry for the victims and it is unfortunate that I have to be saying that the man held for these crimes is innocent in my opinion. That is life and that is crime cases. If I were innocent I would want someone sticking up for me. I am not a scientist but I have studied crime cases a lot and in my opinion for a rather strange reason I know more about some cases than anyone else and because of this I know there have been misidentifications through the DNA genealogy processes correctly being used. In this respect it is not a straight forward DNA match and in my lay man's terms I would say this is because the processes used are poor science and allow the DNA to mislead. I do not think the article I quoted is poor journalism but good journalism and it is poor journalism where people do not critically examine the facts. Thank you.
Just want to make one more point if I can please then I think it is probably best to agree to slightly disagree. I believe that many DNA genealogy hits are being incorrectly presented as fact when they are not fact and are in fact incorrect. So I cannot accept someone saying that these DNA hits are factual as the end of my argument against them because the whole point is I am arguing against possible errors being presented as fact. Thank you for your thoughts and interest.
It seems that jaejae is just trying to muddy the water, nothing more.Again, I ask you Jaejae to provide fact based links for this opinion.
They haven't released what he did in the AF nor have they released the trucking companies that he worked for but both have been confirmed
I’d like to know where he worked in ‘99. I thought it was odd that during the press conference in March, McCraney’s wife said she didn’t remember where he was working when the murders occurred. She “knows him better than he knows himself” and tracks him via Life360 but can’t remember where he was working in 1999? They had no problem saying they wouldn’t comment on what he was doing the day of the murders. I’m sure they knew the press would also ask where he worked at the time. Why not just say they wouldn’t comment on that either? Maybe I’m reading too much into it?
Innocent until proven guilty, yet lack of any explanation how McCraney’s DNA would be on clothing and inside one of the victims, he should remain behind bars until trial, IMO. Perhaps a hearing may shed light on other evidence, such as handprint on vehicle. I see no reason to let a suspect of 1st degree murder out on bail. DNA is science, fact, about as good as it gets, folks.
Unfortunately "we" in the EU can't read this....
Can someone please give a 10% synopsis on this - and conditions of his bail?
TIA!
edited to add - or is just the same article as posted in #850?
I think you will find that there will be no bond for Mr. McCraney.
Bond is extremely rare in capital cases.
Once everything comes out you will also find that OPD,DCSO, et.al had Mr. McCraney under human and electronic surveillance even before they asked him to submit a dna sample. The timeline laid out tells that tale once looked at closely. What better way to gather culpability than letting a suspect tip their own hand after the possibility of being caught than their actions after the thought of capture was planted in mind.
It’s a risk of flight, but with the magnitude of this case, enough resources were put into place to prevent that. Assured. Calculated risk to reward. After all, they could have arrested him anytime earlier, but he was pulled over in Daleville??? He had more than the tooth fairy watching him even before the dna sampling.
Sounds like real police work .... we will see.
It probably has taken the heat off others. Who knows ...