alyssa5597
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2015
- Messages
- 656
- Reaction score
- 7,203
I’m just saying, they most likely had this video evidence, identified suspect #2, and released the pictures of the suspect at the gas station (since the gas station video defiantly was not video evidence of the crime- just pictures/video of him). I’m pretty sure they had this evidence from day 1. They said witness statements and video evidence which makes sense when they released this video. Just my opinion though. I could be wrong.
It never said video evidence of the crime.
The quote you posted was:
“The two are still persons of interest in the 3-year-old's disappearance because video evidence and witnesses connect them to the vehicle police recovered over the weekend”
Video evidence and witnesses CONNECT THEM TO THE VEHICLE not connect them to the crime.