All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
BBM
I, a Florida Tax Payer, hope to hear these words spoken by Judge Perry "Denied with Prejudice!"
That sounds about right to me, especially after Baez has filed the same motion for what? a 3rd time after winning his first motion.
:twocents:

I did enjoy it when jb was arguing a point about something or another and brought up TES and JP told him to leave it aone!!!
 
ITA. Should Baez get his way, this bus will be the size of a 747 jet! I don't know how much lower you can go if you are throwing even dogs under your wheels to get your sociopathic client off the hook. I hope JP denies them so hard the word "denied" is permanently engraved on their foreheads. We'll see how people will react if one of their loved ones should ever go missing. I have the feeling they're going to have a hard time getting anyone to help them search...

ITA--after what they did to Roy Kronk ---- PLEASE!!!!! Remember the last time they argued this in front of Judge Strickland--they were to have a witness that didn't show up...one would think they would get a hint!!!

ps...I don't think they have a bus big enough for what they will be driving thru on....I now think it is a train--what size I have no clue---
 
ITA--after what they did to Roy Kronk ---- PLEASE!!!!! Remember the last time they argued this in front of Judge Strickland--they were to have a witness that didn't show up...one would think they would get a hint!!!

ps...I don't think they have a bus big enough for what they will be driving thru on....I now think it is a train--what size I have no clue---

And that witness was Joe Jordan! According to the motion,

8. It is transparently clear that law enforcement involved in this case, not being pleased with the December 13th e-mail from Mr. Jordan, have intimidated Mr. Jordan about his very valuable and exculpatory evidence in threatening Mr. Jordan with a potential exposure to prosecution for the possible felony of purportedly surreptitiously violating Florida Statute 934.03 by making the recording.(bold mine)

Motion:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/23477589/detail.html

In his October 28, 2009 interview with Cpl. Edwards, it seems more that Jordan is concerned about what sort of legal trouble he would be in due to his surruptitious taping. Edwards walks him through the process of dealing with his attorney and the tape.

Of most interest was that Jordan had reported that Laura Buchanan (the savior of the defense) or the defense may have forged TES documents!

There is so much more we learn in his interviews, such as the fact that he recanted the e-mail, saying it was a result of discouragement after the search.

JJ 9/28/09 Interview:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918297/detail.html

JJ 11/5/09 Interview:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918267/detail.html

My overall impression was that LE and JJ's attorney helped him through a difficult legal situation they would not have known about unless JJ told them!
 
As we all know this did NOT come up in the latest hearings; nor did JB mention it when HHJP asked if he had additional motions ready to be scheduled.

For those with more experience, is there a 10 day 'cooling' period from when this was filed before it can be heard before the court to allow for responses?

Generally I was a bit surprised that this whole motion wasn't heard (the one revisiting Strickland's pervious orders).....

MOO
 
I just finished reading this latest motion by "Tight Boots Mason", and ya'll have pretty much posted the same feelings that I have. I did notice one tiny thing at the end...

The motion is "hand delivered" to LDB and JA and "mailed" to NeJame. This is either for one reason, or another, or both....

1. So Mr. NeJames doesn't get his copy in time to file his response before next weeks hearing

or

2. just as a gesture of the lack of respect that the defense team has for Mr. NeJame...his will come in the regular mail. :rolleyes:


This defense is making me sicker and sicker with each passing day, court appearance and motion filed. :sick::sick::sick:

OT to this thread---just a comment regarding the part of the motion requesting the tips that Baez never went to get back in 2008. I can't believe the defense has the unmitigated gall to come back now to request these...NOW that the state of Florida taxpayers can pay for these tips. Grrrrrrr!!!!!

Is there anything JB did, that actually cost money, before KC was declared indigent? Where the heck did all the money go that they got for pictures of Caylee, from Macaluso, etc? I sure pray that Judge Perry asks for and gets a FULL accounting of all expenses prior to indigency. How much you want to bet that NONE of the experts have been paid a dime yet...The JAC and JP have their work cut out for them, that's for sure.


I could not agree more, it is unmitigated gall!!!! I was going back over some of what has went on in the TES records request debacle, and looking back at the hearings, I just get the biggest kick out of Mr. Nejame, he is literally in shock over this b s that comes across his desk from the defense!!
filed with the Clerk's office 2/26 by Nejame's office.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/27552747...al-Docs-Notice

According to this notice, Baez scheduled a meeting 6 months ago to look at all the docs, canceled the meeting and has never rescheduled.....yet Baez continued to file frivolous motions to get the docs, even though he had access to them. The fact that they made the appointment is very , very important...because unlike what they pretend....obviously they knew the records were available to them to come and review. I know that Mark will mop the floor with the defense over this glaring fact.

Six months!!!!

What in the world?! Are they waiting for Dr. Lee?
I know I am exaggerating....but they are making a mockery of the court's time with their silly motions and their recent ones imply that TES and or Mark have done things out of bounds just gets to me. You are right, since they may know that Casey is responsible....the TES records may hold no key for them...any more than the boxes and CDs of tips did.

It is too funny that he made the appointment, then canceled it. One of these situations may not make Casey suffer damages, but when you put them all together....it is getting absurd, imo.
I hope the court does award attorney fees to send a message that this is getting old.
________________________________________
http://www.wftv.com/news/22535671/detail.html


The lawyer for TES expected that the defense would retract their accusation that he released the TES documents to the press. When they did not, he filed a motion with the court, responding to that and their requests for all of the documents. The very experienced Mr. Nejame, sets out the defense is out of line, and has their facts wrong. Again.

Nejame asks the court to award TES attorney fees.
snip

"He has caused unnecessary attorney time and Court time to be wasted, especially since he has been fully advised of its misrepresentations and inaccuracies and nevertheless continues to proceed," NeJame wrote.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp-TNj55rls[/ame]
It seems Mr. Sheaffer stands on the side of Mr. Nejame on this topic.
________________________________________
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Evidence Released 02/16/10

http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

He explained that it is clear the defense is still on a fishing expedition to muster up something to back up Todd's claims. "If they had the proof ...they would produce the exculpatory evidence required by the rules of procedure. That coupled with the fact that they keep going off into the area that they need the Texas Equusearch records....they are still fishing , trying to come up with something that they do not have, that they never did have . They missed their deadline. They have not produced their proof and that is because THEY DON'T HAVE IT!!" This whole defense response was entirely inappropriate"


Todd: "We want to review these documents ourselves. "
________________________________________
"Counsel for the defense was overly broad as it relates to materiality. You have already denied their request once because it was done inappropriately. Now they have come in and done a new motion. It is still done inappropriately.

The request made by counsel is absurd.
I am being overly generous in my characterization of that.": Mark Nejame to the judge.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7LsKP77ycw[/ame]
My favorite line here: "I am being OVERLY GENEROUS IN MY CHARACTERIZATION" , Mr. Nejame argued to the judge regarding the defense.
Our own Mr. Hornsby: " The state is preparing their rebuttal case. "

After the defense has put on their case..The searchers that may claim they searched and the remains were not there..."The prosecution is going to come back with their rebuttal and just destroy them....demonstrate that their witnesses with showing that they are misleading, were dishonest or just plain wrong about what they remember, " Mr. Hornsby said.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1XhJhCVSyw[/ame]

Defense is once again requesting all 4000 TES records, as well as the tapes on JJ. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HH2EcHM0_8[/ame]

There are 34 pages to this latest Motion by Mason.

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/23477589/detail.html

Now, with the new judge what are they thinking? again. Good luck with that guys!
 
I'm tired of the defense trying to point fingers at TES and others with this crime.It was Cindy that wanted TES ,but only alive Caylee.Then it was LE fault if Cayllee was found died ,It would be at there feet.
 
In their motions for the TES records defense states that it is important for them to see the TES records to establish "time and manner of death". Wouldn't their experts have ventured an opinion looking at the remains site and the remains as to when approximately when Caylee died??? And if these records were so important they would have stayed there, tagged them and asked the judge to review them to determine if they could in fact have them. How important is it when you are SCARED by the media????? Lions, tigers and bears...oh, my!!!!! jmo
 
I'm tired of the defense trying to point fingers at TES and others with this crime.It was Cindy that wanted TES ,but only alive Caylee.Then it was LE fault if Cayllee was found died ,It would be at there feet.

sadly this is the avenue they have chosen...It will always be someone elses fault--they just need to figure out who to blame---I think this will be a constant going forward...What is bad is all those who truly wanted to help fnd Caylee have been brought into this and protrayed as criminals--& we are told to feel sorry for ICA???:furious: That she is a "victim"????:furious:-- They will use and use and continue to use whatever garbage they can figure...while the SA will use facts the defense will use __________ (fill in the blank) :waitasec:
 
And, isn't it funny that their own witnesses (JJ and LB) aren't stepping up to back them up?

They are the foundation for the latest motion (denied by Strickland) and motion for reconsideration.

Without that motion, the foundation crumbles and they want all the docs to find new people to back them up. Funny, if there were someone out there who legitimately believed they searched that area and it was bone-dry, they would want to step forward to tell the truth!

(some sarcasm, sorry)
 
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Prosecutors said Tuesday that Casey Anthony's defense team is not entitled to certain forensic evidence from out-of-state experts.

Also Tuesday, attorneys for Texas Equusearch said they were not notified prior to a June 1 hearing being scheduled. They're asking the date for any issue involving them to be rescheduled.

http://www.wesh.com/news/23669713/detail.html
 
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Prosecutors said Tuesday that Casey Anthony's defense team is not entitled to certain forensic evidence from out-of-state experts.

Also Tuesday, attorneys for Texas Equusearch said they were not notified prior to a June 1 hearing being scheduled. They're asking the date for any issue involving them to be rescheduled.

http://www.wesh.com/news/23669713/detail.html

Is the June 1 hearing to re-hear decisions made by JS? And one of them may be TES documents they want? Is that right? TIA
 
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Prosecutors said Tuesday that Casey Anthony's defense team is not entitled to certain forensic evidence from out-of-state experts.

Also Tuesday, attorneys for Texas Equusearch said they were not notified prior to a June 1 hearing being scheduled. They're asking the date for any issue involving them to be rescheduled.

http://www.wesh.com/news/23669713/detail.html

Here is the Notice of Conflict, also posted in the motions thread:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/40239232/05242010-Notice-of-Conflict

.
 
That Nejames is such a class act. His motions are written well, and his wording, as in "the undersigned counsel has memorialized the circumstances and conflict...." is point blank to the point! Take THAT, Cheney!
 
Here is the Notice of Conflict, also posted in the motions thread:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/40239232/05242010-Notice-of-Conflict

.

I went and looked at the certificate of service earlier this afternoon. Actually, my first thought was, "NOT AGAIN!" (since they have a habit of 'forgetting' to send notices to all parties). However, they did include MN on the notice, but I found it funny that they chose to hand-deliver those to the SA and send MN's USMail. And, nowhere did it indicate that a courtesy copy had been faxed.

It is just common courtesy to call ALL parties to coordinate a hearing date. Lots of calendars to coordinate, ya know.


Maybe I'm just in a bad mood, but I am sick of the big egos playing childish games. And that is ALL this is.
 
Why does this defense team seem so lazy and so inept?

Why does JB want the prosecution to do their job for them?

What is it that JB just doesn't seem to get or grasp???



Anthony Defense, Prosecution Argue Over Evidence
Hearing Also Rescheduled Because Of EquuSearch Conflict
POSTED: 11:58 am EDT May 25, 2010
UPDATED: 6:02 pm EDT May 25, 2010

Prosecutors said Tuesday that Casey Anthony's defense team is not entitled to certain forensic evidence from out-of-state experts.

Officials with the state attorney's office said information such as FBI records are out of their jurisdiction.

In a new motion, Anthony's defense team complained that state attorney Jeff Ashton did not provide sufficient details about the five aggravating factors leading them to seek the death penalty against Anthony. Ashton said nothing about the defense demands in a written response.

Defense attorney Richard Hornsby said they're not legally required to provide those details.

"It really boils down to the defense wants to get to the state's theory. They want to understand why and what it is the state will rely upon and try to prove at trial in showing this premeditation," Hornsby said.

Hornsby agreed with the argument Ashton made in court that this is protected work the state is not required to reveal. He said the defense is also seeking evidence that is out of the prosecution's jurisdiction, meaning the defense will have to get it themselves.

One example is the so-called experimental research upon which the Oak Ridge Laboratory in Tennessee tested the air in Anthony's car.

Anthony's defense attorneys asked the lab to reveal to them the hundreds of compounds they used to come to the conclusion that the air did show signs of decomposition.

"If Oak Ridge Laboratories refuses to comply, I think the defense is well within their right to ask this evidence be excluded from trial because they can't confront it (and) can't challenge it," Hornsby said.

But Hornsby said the defense will have to take it upon themselves to subpoena that information just as they did with the records from Texas EquuSearch.
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/23669713/detail.html

If the defense can't figure out the prosecutions angle, maybe JB and team should reread the over 14,000 pages of evidence they have so far, with this team they seem to have, tell me not one of them knows which way this trial is driving, just so incredulous...JMHO


Justice for Caylee
 
Why does this defense team seem so lazy and so inept?

Why does JB want the prosecution to do their job for them?

What is it that JB just doesn't seem to get or grasp???





If the defense can't figure out the prosecutions angle, maybe JB and team should reread the over 14,000 pages of evidence they have so far, with this team they seem to have, tell me not one of them knows which way this trial is driving, just so incredulous...JMHO


Justice for Caylee

BBM
What is it that he does not get or grasp? The rules of the State of Fl criminal procedures, in whole or in part.
 
I'm tired of the defense trying to point fingers at TES and others with this crime.It was Cindy that wanted TES ,but only alive Caylee.Then it was LE fault if Cayllee was found died ,It would be at there feet.

I agree! April 05, 2010 — Part 1 -
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/in...

Part 2 -
http://www.wftv.com/video/23057236/in...
My favorite part, Mrs. Drane-Burdick lets the judge know that she looked at the documents with no problem whatsoever, despite Mr. Baez explaining it would be impossible!!
Judge Denies Defense Motion -
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/23059303/deta...

They want a do over , again. Good grief!!
 
No, what I think they really want is to do a criminal record search on all 4,000 searchers. That's all they want. They're hoping one of those 4,000 people has a conviction or had a criminal charge against a child. They're hoping just one pedophile was in that 4,000. And then point the finger at that person. That's why they're fighting so hard to get these 4,000 records.

:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
 
we all know they are going for that "SODDI" program...but how are they gong to connect all the dots between all the lies and such????? kc going to work "just like a normal day" leaving her with Zanny (remember of course Zanny is wonderful and forgiven by kc and totally understood as to why she just won't come forward)--none of her lines can be explained during that 31 days and then top it off with CA 911 when she basically tells kc to get on the phone and kc isn't volunterarily giving info out....and doens't even want to talk with them....

Would the State be willing to pay for all those FBI searches on the TES employees???? The background checks????? This just reminds me of talking with my kids and finally asking them "how many ways/times do I need to tell you "NO"---" I mean jb should have gathered that no one wants to play his little game---even that defense witness never appeared (hmmmmm guess we could start a rumor that he was with zanny???) Lord have mercy.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
207
Guests online
301
Total visitors
508

Forum statistics

Threads
609,289
Messages
18,252,091
Members
234,595
Latest member
slyshe11
Back
Top