bearbear
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 4,614
- Reaction score
- 16,158
Toni stated that the QPS asked her if she was aware of other women in Gerards stable.. a reasonable question.. it couldnt be assumed by the QPS that Toni was all there was... they didnt name them. She named one, the QPS then named the other..or one other at that time..they had his pc and phone. Davis said the QPS told her, but that was a bit of a poetic licence. Toni didnt say that on the stand, and it isnt in any of her 4 statements that she was told off the bat the names.. she was asked if there were any others...
the point is.. why is Gerard instructing his barrister to chase this down? what is its relevance to Gerard? Every question Davis asked of witnesses goes to the heart of what Gerard thinks is relevant, so its curiousity value is in the time and amount of witnesses expended on it.
maybe they are wondering if, by putting the seed of doubt into tm by telling her or hinting about other women, it will prompt her to ring gbc asap on their bugged phones and hopefully their conversation will give the police some evidence? i dont know if they are hoping to get the police for entrapment or even if thats possible?