mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,811
- Reaction score
- 815
That is true if they are reporting to insurance, everything has to be medically necessary within strict definitions of it. But when you are paying cash (or have a donor promising to pay cash, or have a body of board members deciding to write it off) then those time constraints are no longer accurate. Think of celebrities and how they can stay in their birthing suites for way longer than most of us- because they have cash to pay for it.
Kind of irrelevant, because I think they probably can make a medical case for keeping her.
Just noting that those are insurance boundaries, and MK likely has no insurance. I would not be surprised if the hospital has decided to donate their services to these three women. I think they've pretty much captured everyone's hearts.
They may decide to forgive the cost of the hospital stay but most hospital boards wouldn't agree to accept a person as a patient, unless they had a medical or mental/emotional need. Besides the cost of the room and the staff and food, there is the fact that a hospital room in use prevents it being used by a patient who needs hospital services.
If the hospital was concerned about her being homeless, it would cost them much less to put her up in a hotel than keep her in the hospital.
(And yes celebrities get to stay in the hospital longer. They make it financially worthwhile for the hospital.)