redheadedgal
Former Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Messages
- 4,659
- Reaction score
- 104
Since it appears that the only answer you will get is "motive isn't needed" or something along those lines, I figured I would answer for you. This time around the motive was because of an arguement over an unflushed toilet. No need to read that twice as it does in fact say an unflushed toilet. So RG goes to the bathroom, doesn't flush, Meredith scolds Amanda because her "guest" (RG) didn't flush, Amanda gets upset about it and has RG kill Meredith while she and RS hold Meredith down.
Sounds like a reasonable motive, doesn't it?!? :banghead:
poo-rugia :floorlaugh:
Interesting thing about this case is how quick the argument about what Steve Moore said about the case is turned into an attack on Moore as a person.
Any student of formal logic should recognize the fallacy of this line of argument.
yes, easy to see the faults of moore but not one italian connected to all the disputed evidence :facepalm: