It will be interesting to see what the Supreme Court's motivation report actually says. I would like to know the actual reason for the decision. I watched Ted Simon (one of Amanda's lawyers) on GMA this morning, and I think he said that the Appeal Court did not open up enough new testimony.
This, of course, could mean yet another independent look and the DNA forensics. As far as I know, the Conti-Vechiotti report will remain as a part of the record. They can't retest the bra fastener again, as it has rusted, but will they retest the knife?
I remember that there were lots of things that the defense had requested to be reopened, but were denied by Hellmann. Presumably, these are all back on the table. Will they have expert testimony looking into the computer evidence? How about time of death? The footprints found by luminal that tested negative for blood?
I haven't seen much about it, but it seems that the calunnia conviction was not overturned. If that is the case, then Amanda's statements will be out as far as this next trial. I suspect that Amanda's legal team will be appealing that conviction to the ECHR.
In the end, I am disappointed that the court ruled as it did, but I do not see how AK and RS can be convicted by a just court. Now we await the motivations report, and Amanda's book and interview. Guess we will continue to talk about this case for years to come. :-(