Katie-L
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 0
Completely false. It is your opinion only. That is not 'everyone'. There is no disagreement about what Luminol is. The disagreement is that the traces are not blood or that the evidence has no value just because a confirmatory test is not possible. These claims have not been sourced at all. You can't state them as facts without any sourcing. Not even the defense made these kind of claims. This is from the defense expert.
Massei report
As I'm not the author of
Wikipedia on "Luminol" Luminol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, or
"How Stuff Works" http://www.howstuffworks.com/luminol.htm or
"About Chemistry" (Luminol) http://chemistry.about.com/od/glowinthedarkprojects/a/luminolblood.htm, or
"the Royal Society of Chemistry - Oxidization of Luminol" http://www.rsc.org/images/chemiluminescence_tcm18-188811.pdf
Nor of "the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension / Forensic Science"
https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bc...es/forensic-programs-crime-scene-luminol.aspx
Nor do I control Google and what comes up when you search for what Luminol is and how it oxidizes, it's not my opinion.
You asked for sources earlier and I provided them. More are above. The rest is up to you.