Andrea Lyon New DP Atty

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
So what happens to AL if the murder/agg assault/child abuse charges are dropped....
 
LOL!

JB & LKB seem to think the charges should be dropped......Would AL withdraw from the case if it was not dp?
 
LOL!

JB & LKB seem to think the charges should be dropped......Would AL withdraw from the case if it was not dp?

Yes,I think she withdraws ,even if just the DP is taken off the table.
 
So what happens to AL if the murder/agg assault/child abuse charges are dropped....

I guess she can get busy with her new book tour and maybe her students and helpers will stop posting on WS (if they are indeed here as I believe)
 
I guess she can get busy with her new book tour and maybe her students and helpers will stop posting on WS (if they are indeed here as I believe)

Bold mine.

ITA. I've noticed one or two here lately. :rolleyes:
 
Bold mine.

No, I think she latched onto KC's case because of all the National news about it. In the beginning, it was on TV every night on Nancy Grace. Lyon is looking for the case that exposes her the most to the media and gets her alot of press. JMO


Or perhaps because it was a great oppportunity to take advantage of "hands on learning" for her students while she tends to more personal financial gains (re: book tour, etc)
 
Well stated! What about that reply don't you understand, Defense???:waitasec:
 
MM, you are the best...

<now where is the spanking icon that the defense should be receiving?>
 
Re: the State's Response to Preclude DP, I loved the way the state stuck it to the defendant on the 'bad faith' portion!!! :dance:

Also, and I have no idea what I'm talking about legally and could be way off, but it seemed that the repeated phrasing of what and how it is done in Florida was also sticking it to the atty's from out of state....iow...we don't care how you do it in Cali or Ill. or wherever the he77 you're from, In Florida, it's done like this....:woohoo:

TY Muzikman....:Banane08: you rock!
 
Regarding the check fraud trial...
I fail to see WHY she is required for this case. Didn't Judge S. state that it wouldn't require much effort? I know another Judge will preside over this case...or am I wong. If I am right....why wasn't this filed with that Judge referenced?
 
Or perhaps because it was a great oppportunity to take advantage of "hands on learning" for her students while she tends to more personal financial gains (re: book tour, etc)

Maybe she's trying to win a free makeover before appearing on court TV!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
265
Total visitors
395

Forum statistics

Threads
609,660
Messages
18,256,411
Members
234,714
Latest member
Rabs1982
Back
Top