Uh huh
Of course, ALL attorneys always act above board!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh huh
How do you know they only looked at BC? Did CPD inform you about every interview they conducted between 7/12/08 and 10/27/08? Or are you taking everything the defense says as gospel?
We have access to so many legal docs in this thing. Based on what the defense says, who is it that CPD should be looking at? How can you look at someone else if you don't have anybody? Or if alibis are solid for the 2 or 3 people you might consider? If Nancy was having an affair, wouldn't Brad have had at least an inkling, given how he monitored her communications - and given the police a name? Heck I know I woulda.
Uh huh
I think the issue isn't so much that they only focused on BC, it's that in the early days of the investigation, the only evidence they had was hearsay from neighbors/friends. It would be troubling to me if they only focused on him based on that and only that.
This is why CPD hasn't came out in this trial and said they focused on him (and only him) from the very beginning.
We have access to so many legal docs in this thing. Based on what the defense says, who is it that CPD should be looking at? How can you look at someone else if you don't have anybody? Or if alibis are solid for the 2 or 3 people you might consider? If Nancy was having an affair, wouldn't Brad have had at least an inkling, given how he monitored her communications - and given the police a name? Heck I know I woulda.
So who else should they have been focused on? Its okay to say they should focus elsewhere. But nobody seems to have given a physical description of anyone for them to focus UPON. Should they have looked for a man, or a woman? A white van or a maroon one? Should they haul people out of maroon vans and look at them closely?
Honestly, I don't know the relationship he had with her and really don't care. I don't think it makes any difference at all to deciding if he killed NC or not.
There are names. One of whom does not have a solid alibi, had an adversarial meeting with NC prior to her disappearance and lied in his initial interview with the police.
There is another person, had gone running recently with NC. Stated when they ran she left her house and ran up to Lochmere to meet this person.
Who knows if there are more.
I think the issue isn't so much that they only focused on BC, it's that in the early days of the investigation, the only evidence they had was hearsay from neighbors/friends. It would be troubling to me if they only focused on him based on that and only that. We even caught a hint that CPD didn't buy his story from the very beginning because Greer testified that they told the ME that last time seen was shortly after midnight, not 7am. (this was on the 15th when the body was found)
This is why CPD hasn't came out in this trial and said they focused on him (and only him) from the very beginning.
I have a question for you knowledgeable sleuths out there. This thing about the state using the FBI to do their computer forensics is a bit puzzling to me. I thought the FBI didn't generally get involved in a trial unless it was a Federal trial. Is it common for the FBI to act as experts in state trials or did the state use the FBI because of the current credibility problems with the NC SBI?
The "FBI" computer forensic expert CC is actually a Durham police detective who is dual-badged I think as a "Deputy US Marshal" as part of the FBI Cyber Crime Task Force. By doing the work under the "FBI" label, the police are able to deny all those pesky Brady rights by claiming protected methods under the National Security exemption. "We think you guilty, sorry we can't tell just why. Can't let the terrorists win." Total BS. CC had only examined 5 computers before BC's.
Anyway, that is what is going regarding the FBI.
Nancy's unknown boyfriend that her friends either didn't know about, or hid from LE in order to railroad Brad? That's it!
What did the CPD do with regards to investigation of these people? Has it been published? The assumption here is nothing, but do you know the assumption is correct?
Heck yeah. At a minimum, you can compare what each thought she was wearing or document what she was wearing. That would potentially eliminate some of them from being credible.
That perhaps somebody else killed NC rather than BC. They didn't even consider this possibility. Very unprofessional for a law enforcement agency, in my opinion
Hopefully we will find out more as the trial continues. The information was not turned over during discovery and Det. Y did not feel the potential of NC being in a relationship with somebody was important to the investigation.
That'd have to be some boyfriend she had there, no wonder she was having an affair. A tech whiz able to plant files and change timestamps and also convince a whole buncha people to perjure theirselves for him.
Because they are friends of friends of mine. Let's just say - that it will get very intense and interesting.
Maybe he looked good by the pool and was great with kids? That seems to be a plus in Lochmere. They haven't outed him because he's the neighborhood gigolo.