YellowDog
New Member
When was the author who wrote "The Shack" in Little Rock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
William 'Paul' Young
Yes, but when was he in Little Rock at a function that Anne attended?
I am going to have to look up what "ambiguous sexual orientation" means........
One thing that has troubled me with this case from the beginning was the statement of the victim having an "ambiguous sexual orientation". Could this explain why there seems to be very little dating mentioned with a person of the opposite sex? If she had ambiguous sexual genitalia, this could explain why she was mutilated in that area. A rapist who was not expecting this could be infuriated. Could the murderer have been a woman? Could this be one of the reasons LE is keeping everything so quiet?
There is some reason this case is being kept so quiet.
I thought sexual orientation meant who one has sexual attraction to and ambigious means unclear or open to interpretation. I don't think it means she had both man parts and women parts. Just maybe attracted to both men and women. I don't know but I sure hope they figure out this case quickly. I would be concered living in that area with someone capable of doing this still being out there. My sympathies to her family and friends - such a horrible crime.
I am not even going there. A young woman was brutally beaten that ultimately died of her injuries. There is a vile, rage filled sadist out there who needs to be incarcerated for the rest of his life or put to death.
There is no excuse for what was done to Anne. There is no reason worthy of discussion other than to bring the culprit to justice.
You're right. That's absolutely what it means. I doubt very seriously if she were born with both male and female genitalia that they would mention that in the news article. Of course they mentioned "ambiguous sexual orientation" and that has no bearing on the case either.
I just don't understand why they would have included that in the news article unless they thought it might have something to do with her death. Of course, some of the news articles I've read lately aren't written much better than I write.
That term- seems to me -was used per chance as a choice of words by another poster, regarding their own version of the attack.
I think it was poorly worded, I took it to mean "intimate details, unknown"
not ambiguous. Can we let this one go?
My Gosh, maybe she was a virgin. Has anyone ever thought of that?