Even the sister can be accounted for. If the girls ran away into a life of prostitution et cetera, they could easily have lost track of each other, and Jackie especially was young enough that she could have wound up in foster care or something where there was another family she thought of as hers.
That's assuming you believe James. I don't think I do. I think he just likes to be in control, and every time it looks like he might be losing it, he comes up with another tidbit that might or might not have any bearing on reality.
And then there's the whole dimension of whether she told him the truth in the first place...
I did contact her again this is what i said and this was her reply
.5 foot 4 at 13 she would have growm=n a few inches and here hight has been stated other wise at 5ft 5 so she would have been around her highest age and i think this warrant a dna comparison
and Jane doe was said to be as high as 30 and thats how old jackie would have been when EDJD died
FRI 3:53PM
The height is not a factor. The age and the moles are the determining factors that our experienced LE team does not believe this would be a good match. We rarely make this decision.
We came to this conclusion as the unidentified Jane Doe was found deceased in 1991 and estimate age at the time of death (1991) was 20 to 30 years of age.
In 1991, the girls respectively would have been 30 and 32. So while they come in at the top of that age range; the other factor is that of the missing moles. Both girls had moles.
If, and only if, the girls were still alive in 1991 and now located in another state (which can happen). we still are left with the fact the unidentified girl did not have any moles.
Here's what we can do. Our team can call LE and verify completely that the Jane Doe did not have any moles. If that's case, that's best we can do as they'd be ruled out. But if inconclusive or they are not sure, we'll submit. Cause we do believe anything can be possible.
Rebel J Morris
Executive Director