Reading the media thread beginning from page one, I came to the post where JA begins to explain to the detective what may have happened to her psychologically. In post #166 on January 15th, she introduces the idea that she may be experiencing the "butterfly effect" which is a new concept to me.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - *graphic and adult content* Jodi Arias Trial media/ timeline thread **no discussion**
Notice the date when the man who came up with the theory died, April 2008.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/obit-lorenz-0416.html
obituary of Edward Lorenze, father if chaos theory and butterfly effect
Read the dialogue from the 2004 film here:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/The_Butterfly_Effect
A few posts prior to the post in which JA introduces the term "butterfly effect", I noticed that TA had made two longish phones calls to JA in the early morning hours of June 2, 2008. The first call was made at 03:04 and was 17 mins 25 secs long; the second call was placed at 03:21 and lasted 41 mins, 21 secs.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - *graphic and adult content* Jodi Arias Trial media/ timeline thread **no discussion**
When did JA find out she wasn't going with Travis to Cancun?
When she was told she would no longer be the woman going with him, it may have been the "something as small as the flutter of a butterfly's wing" that set off the "typhoon" that followed.
In my mind, the chain of events leading up to the murder has to be presented clearly to the jury including the steps or missteps that TA took leading up to JA's actions. The scenario can't be left up to the individual jurors' imaginations. As I'm reading through the earliest testimony, the way it unfolds, JA seems to be giving us the answers. She thinks she's providing excuses as she tiptoes towards making a confession but, to me, she's revealing what was going on with her psychologically regarding her relationship with TA.
If she found out she wasn't going to Cancun with TA weeks before June 4, yet he urged her to come visit him (long phone calls early June 2) before he left for Cancun with another woman, that could have been too much for her to handle despite her claims that she was happy to be his friend with benefits. What might has been worse is if she found out she wouldn't be going with him as late as June 4. Since she planned on visiting that other guy around these same dates, I don't think that's the case though, right?
Does anybody know if TA wanted/invited JA there on June 4 or did she just show up on his doorstep?
I've asked these questions before but I can't find/piece together the concrete answers to them. The answers would help me (and the jurors) get a clear picture of how the events that led up to JA killing TA influenced her decisions. Why would he want her at his house if they were finished and he had moved on to other women? This mind muddle has to be explained/cleared up to make sure the jurors can think straight when deciding a verdict.
One more question, did JA back out of the trip herself? If so, is it a proven fact that she did?