taking someone's rights from them, or even 'borrowing' them
for 3 days based upon what's going on in their head is a very serious matter,
there must be very good evidence of real-life danger.
if nobody knew about bombs or guns he was just a guy
having mental problems in a stressful time that included dangerous thoughts.
(according to the school's statement)
I'm sure it would be a difficult concept to talk to victims about,
but we're not talking to victims here.
Its like a pilot saying maybe we should divert
there must be very good evidence of real-life danger.
If there is not very good evidence of real-life danger.on July 21 then we are in serious trouble!
It is not taking a right , it is diverting a plane, that in a trained individuals judgement call is the bet choice at this time as the plane dives.
same stuff ! Cause it is mental illiness and there are stigmas; folks dont think we need to make judgement calls based on training, experience etc etc. This is no different than a dentist lawyer doctor etc etc
Invol commiment , is not punishing anyone , has nothing to do with rights, it has to do with concluding that we need to divert this individual into a safe place wherein both the client and others are safe.
its not locking someone up - its hoping to divert a crash .......
Doc, in this instance, cause all kinds of beurocratic nonsense, did not follow her clinical gut and take action.. clinical judgement did not "occur "