Curious Me
Who When Where What Why & How
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,327
- Reaction score
- 113,428
I bet it's about CA finding one white hair from Zanny's dog.
Ah, but you forgot to add...all because LE hasn't told us the truth!
Who could sleep knowing folks are talking about ya. Pointing out all your lies, ..ah.. mistruths..
Besides.... what else so to do? Is she working yet?
Sure she is!! Cindy's working with a PI, a lawyer and a producer!! Oh, and I nearly forgot-she's working with a slew of peeps that fly under the radar!! She's still apparently looking for Caylee, helping with KC's defense, and trying to get her foundation off the ground!! My God-this woman is multi-tasking!!![]()
She must be exhausted!!:innocent:
Slidell! See? proves my point....we both lived in Louisiana at one time, so we MUST be in cohoots!!!
"Brad Conway, the attorney for George and Cindy Anthony, said he plans to release even more documents Wednesday, even after the state made more than 1,000 pages of information public Tuesday.
Sources said information Conway is expected to release will show that duct tape found at the crime scene does not match duct tape recovered from the Anthony home, and hair found on the duct tape does not belong to either Casey or Caylee Anthony.
One part of the documents released Tuesday detail the activities of the Anthony family and their detectives running down leads about Caylee's disappearance.
The technical documents consists of hundreds of pages and pages of evidence lists, receipts to show the chain of evidence and lab reports from the FBI."
(cont'd at link)
http://cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/9/29/more_documents_coming_in_casey_case.html
arrot:
My question is why Brad? If this is about the duct tape-why isn't JB or LKB releasing this evidence? Brad is G&C's lawyer not KC's!:waitasec:
Don't think this has been posted yet...But Cfnews 13 supposedly scooped the story for Brad's "grand entry" tomorrow...I so hope they are wrong!!!
Sources: Duct tape at crime scene and Anthony home don't match
http://www.cfnews13.com/
But if this information has not been released to JB et al then how could they have released it to the public and where would BC have gotten it from?
I have a problem with this. Not necessarily because I think that it is needed to convict KC but he had to have gotten this info from somewhere and if he has it, we should have it based on the sunshine laws.....so someone is shining us on.
Because they are expecting that JB is going to throw CA and GA under the bus to save KC, maybe? His interest is with CA and GA, not KC
I could be wrong but I think that info was touched on in the doc's today, wasn't it? I just skimmed through them...have to really go through them in the am...so I could be wrong
Wasn't on of the A's conflicts with MN when he was their attorney, that they expected him to act in KC's interests and not theirs?
BC is an absolute fool for bringing anything like this up. His job is to GA and CA. So far the State Attorney has been quietly letting a ton of really questionable activities, if not outright accesory after the fact and evidence tampering, pass without comment or action. But his grandstanding play just hands a huge target on his actual clients backs for the apparent benefit of KC. BC and the A's are throwing themselves under the bus.
I read a lot of it.....most of it. But some of the FBI lab stuff was just too much for me. I didn't hit every point. Most of it was stuff that I just didn't understand or want to try to understand. I figured someone here would go through it all and explain it in plain english for us simple folks.
Does anyone remember seeing anything about the duct tape not matching and the hairs not matching?
Because they are expecting that JB is going to throw CA and GA under the bus to save KC, maybe? His interest is with CA and GA, not KC
My question is why Brad? If this is about the duct tape-why isn't JB or LKB releasing this evidence? Brad is G&C's lawyer not KC's!:waitasec:
RG was also from NY IIRC...me, too! LOL