essies
"We're all just walking each other home." Ram Dass
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 6,258
- Reaction score
- 6
Yeah, but but it seems odd for it to come thru BC.
Not when you consider who BC takes his orders from!!
Yeah, but but it seems odd for it to come thru BC.
For those who are trying to locate these 19 pages, in relation to the other releases.. here aer the page numbers and the offical page number on the lower right hand corner.
1 8907
2 8908
3 9581
4 9617
5 9618
6 9582
7 9583
8 9584
9 9585
10 9587
11 9588
12 9589
13 8707 (4/8/09 hand written)
14 9890
15 8395
16 8464
17 8465
18 8466
19 8725
Sorry....looking at these docs again is giving me a headache.
I don't see the Report of Examination dated 7/25/09 but I might have missed it. Maybe not. This would be pdf page #3 of the 19 page doc.
I will look some more later but right now I can't take it anymore.
Sorry.
I believe I remember previous test stating there were matchs in the tape with the glue and something else (cant remember I will have to look) but this test result seems to state that the fibers dont match. Could that not just mean that the fibers that were attached to the tape are different, which would be the case if the person handling the same role at different times had on maybe different clothing.
I completely agree with your whole statement with one exception, bolded above....
I think he has not gone over these pages at all but was just told by CINDY what to say
I still say she is pizzzzzzzed about the release of her emails yesterday!!
For those who are trying to locate these 19 pages, in relation to the other releases.. here aer the page numbers and the offical page number on the lower right hand corner.
1 8907
2 8908
3 9581
4 9617
5 9618
6 9582
7 9583
8 9584
9 9585
10 9587
11 9588
12 9589
13 8707 (4/8/09 hand written)
14 9890
15 8395
16 8464
17 8465
18 8466
19 8725
All I can say is....I better not say I'll get into trouble.... :curses:
Some of the documents Conway referred to Wednesday, which they say raise questions about the evidence weve heard about so far, are old reports going back to the beginning of 2009. There are a lot of documents yet to be released, to both the public and the defense, and the FBI might still be conducting tests on some of the evidence at this point. :shakehead:
The Anthonys did not attend the news conference Wednesday. Their attorney said they wanted to seize the opportunity while there were questions out there to try to change public opinion. They admit the overwhelming public opinion right now is that Casey is guilty and they want her to get a fair trial. :bang:
http://www.wftv.com/news/21160448/detail.html
:angel:
Email from JB to BC:
JB: Pssst, Pssst.....Brad, Brad, are you there Brad?
BC: Yeah JoseBGood, what ya need, guy?
JB: Man....than AL has busted my ... chops. She wont let me talk, she wont let me write, she wont even let me visit my girl. I need your help.
BC: Sure, anything for the A team...
JB: I need you to call a presser for Wednesday and...............
I could not agree with you more!!! I just listened to the first half of his press conference, and what a freakin' circus!!
I am interpreting today's little show as NOT being the release of any NEW discovery, but the Brad beginning his little press conference by lambasting the public for forming any kind of opinion about the discovery/documents released so far, but then immediately launching into the ANTHONY'S OPINION of their interpretation of the documents released!
Talk about "talking out both sides of your a$$$$!!
Think I just heard a portion of the defense closing argument AND THE CASE HASN'T EVEN GONE TO TRIAL YET!!!
I have heard enough from BC, as well as the A's. Back to picking apart yesterday's dump....
So the bottom line, a summary of BC's big announcement is............... that Casey didn't steal the duct tape from her parent's home, she stole it from someone else.
I'm really disappointed in him. When I first saw him I thought he was cute and I was hoping he would be really smart and articulate as well...he has a little of the underdog appeal to me, but he is really being manipulated and I am now feeling sorry for him.
Does anyone know if there is an existing thread (perhaps "no discussion) that is a cumulative list of the "evidence"***(see note below) that prosecution may take to trial, based on the all document dumps to this point?
I think it would be interesting and informative to be able to list and look at possible "holes" for the defense to jump into, perhaps speculating if this went to trial now? (similar to the "ping list", "cell phone usage" etc....)
DISCLAIMER: I used the term evidence in quotation marks as a general term to include all documents, witness statements, reports, etc. although technically none of those things are true evidence until they are entered during the trial.
Maybe we can start one? Start with the witness list and go by interviews that have been released. Then forensics. Separate that way and with documented facts like the cell phone pings, etc. A lot of people here have the docs saved so we don't have to rely on any incorrect media reports. Some of the witnesses are experts so we don't know what their testimony will be like the insect experts for instance. We know defense will have their own experts and so on.
LOL No one could write this stuff.