If anyone wants to go back to re-read exactly what Professor Austin said about the DNA testing he was conducting - what is possible, and what is not possible in the Wynarka bones forensic examination - I recommend reading this interview with him.
As it is primary source material, it carries a much greater weight of credibility than secondary reporting.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2015/s4306466.htm
JEREMY AUSTIN: Where we can actually load up the DNA reference samples
for all missing people so that when a set of remains is found, we've actually got a database to do a comparison to straight away, rather than having to go out and ask people to buy DNA samples for particular cases.
Karlie Pearce Stevenson was not on the missing persons list
BUT Angel unknown deceased person DNA would certainly have been in the police databases. imo
I just have a gut feeling the link of Wynarka and Belangalo were made by LE and caller 1267 had info that has seen the case explode.
Investigators said while
finding a suspect's DNA on clothing and a suitcase, which were found near two-year-old Khandalyce Kiara Pearce's remains, may be possible "it is certainly not guaranteed"
Creating the DNA profile was a difficult task given the bones are believed to be about eight to nine years old and had degraded over that time.
"It was interesting because the bones themselves weren't bleached, so it didn't look like they have been out in the sun for a great period of time. They weren't dirty, so they didn't look like they had been buried. So it was surprising the level of degradation that we saw."
We now move onto a different phase on the investigation where we will look at the clothing in the suitcase and the suitcase itself to see if there is some DNA profiles there that might prove useful for the police in their investigation.
"The clothing has been in that suitcase for quite some period of time. We know that it has been spilt out into the open environment," Mr Pearman said.
"The sort of DNA we are looking at typically is called contact DNA so there is not much there to begin with and then being out in the environment
just erodes away the amount of DNA we have to work with.
"We may get a result, it is certainly not guaranteed."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-2...or-dna/6874714