Rainbowbridge
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2015
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe the missing alphabet letter on the I spy quilt is the first letter of the child's name?
It seems perfectly normal to me. Maybe the ladies only walked on a particular day of the week. Maybe it was someone's birthday or apt that day so they knew the date.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think the clothes look random in the sense that the girl's family, or whoever she was with before she died, was probably pretty poor and simply got a hold of whatever clothes they could lay their hands on. It certainly doesn't look like a 'wardrobe'.
But I think it's also important to remember that there could be clothes that we don't know about which are in police possession. Also, the clothes and the suitcase are not the only items involved. Police stated that there were other items in the suitcase, details of which they said emphatically they were not going to release to the public. If these items were simply more clothes and maybe toys, or other belongings of the child, they surely would be useful in a public appeal. Perhaps then, these things are a bit more sinister i.e. things involved in the death or abuse of the child. (Sorry about the horrible thoughts, but that's the sad reality in these cases).
So while the objects we see in front of us look a bit random, perhaps it would all make a bit more sense looking at the collection as a whole.
I respectfully disagree that the items reveal an impoverished background. Although I don't think the items suggest wealth, I think the collection we see matches a middle class lifestyle (though maybe on the lower end of this spectrum...working/middle class). It's not a wardrobe as you point out but more an overnight or weekend's worth of items. My initial thought is that the leotard and tutu is frivolous clothing that is part costume and simply fun for a little girl to wear. That alone suggests money spent on impractical items. Also, there are pajama sets and slippers. Again, I think of such items as being more befitting of a middle class lifestyle. Additionally, although tattered oved time, the clothes were current and stylish in 2007.....and not hand me down..or purely utilitarian.
I keep thinking too about the boys' shorts that were described as a part of a pajama set on ebay. It would seem there was likely a brother and he was slightly older judging by the size. The one item that throws me off is the purse. I don't know why but it seems to not belong. The winter coat is likewise odd considering the clothing is clearly warm weather. However, after thinking about it I decided it illustrates some careful packing suggestive of a caring parent who thought ahead what if it gets cold at night etc. Most young children don't have dozens of coats like most of us might. A child wouldn't think to pack a coat and either would a careless parent. Finally, the suitcase itself looks like solid bag similiar to a few I have. Nothing fancy but poor people wouldn't have much use for luggage.
Thanks Snoop Dog.
I saw that the UK Daily Mail had reported it as if the women were in Wynarka, but ABC News (TV) mentioned the women seeing him in Karoonda.
Since then I have not found either a police or other news source that specifies where the sighting was.
How accurate is the Daily Mail reporting?
Not accurate at all. They always gets facts wrong, and they have even been known to just fabricate entire stories out of no where, like this one:
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/...tly-dumped-dentist-removes-all-her-exs-teeth/
The camel fabric is very unique. Identifying its origin seems like it might provide useful information. I've tried dozens of search terms and sources but turned up nothing that resembles it.
I respectfully disagree that the items reveal an impoverished background. Although I don't think the items suggest wealth, I think the collection we see matches a middle class lifestyle (though maybe on the lower end of this spectrum...working/middle class). It's not a wardrobe as you point out but more an overnight or weekend's worth of items. My initial thought is that the leotard and tutu is frivolous clothing that is part costume and simply fun for a little girl to wear. That alone suggests money spent on impractical items. Also, there are pajama sets and slippers. Again, I think of such items as being more befitting of a middle class lifestyle. Additionally, although tattered oved time, the clothes were current and stylish in 2007.....and not hand me down..or purely utilitarian.
I keep thinking too about the boys' shorts that were described as a part of a pajama set on ebay. It would seem there was likely a brother and he was slightly older judging by the size. The one item that throws me off is the purse. I don't know why but it seems to not belong. The winter coat is likewise odd considering the clothing is clearly warm weather. However, after thinking about it I decided it illustrates some careful packing suggestive of a caring parent who thought ahead what if it gets cold at night etc. Most young children don't have dozens of coats like most of us might. A child wouldn't think to pack a coat and either would a careless parent. Finally, the suitcase itself looks like solid bag similiar to a few I have. Nothing fancy but poor people wouldn't have much use for luggage.
I don't think the clothes really indicate anything about social class, other than not being very wealthy. There's nothing unusual about poor/working class children having party dresses, PJ sets, or luggage. Cotton On is a pretty cheap brand anyway.
The "recreation" photo (for want of a better word) that the police have posted of the quilt shows a black camel on a white background, but was the quilt block really that color? The remains of the actual quilt block don't appear to be black and white - the camel doesn't look nearly that dark. Not to mention that the black and white seems sort of glaringly out of place on a child's quilt.
I was looking at that camel piece last night and to me it looks to have minarets in the background or at least a middle eastern urban skyline.
I agree that we must not think of this bag as being packed for the purposes of a trip.
It is for storage.
The body did not decompose in the bag.
The bones were added to the bag along with various items of clothing and it was stored somewhere for a long time before being dumped on the roadside.
As I understand it, reading between the lines, the body was at one time buried then later dug up and put into the case for storage along with the clothes.
I stand corrected on that notion. I'm new to this case and misread that fact. Unfortunately, that makes the case even more bizarre.
I did a quick search online and think I found the answer, but maybe an Australian citizen can verify whether or not New Zealanders can travel to Australia without a passport?
What if the quilt represents Islamic months or festivals with the camel piece being Shawwal?
The mass group of teddies might be Hajj and the pumpkin and corn patch represent Safar.