Interesting. Is he connecting an accident with the nefarious activity? For example she was using mushrooms to build drugs.Thank you for your reply.
Homicide squad Detective Inspector Dean Thomas has said Patterson remained a suspect because she cooked the meals. But he has also said police were still considering an accidental poisoning “not at the hands of somebody else” to be a possibility, alongside a potentially “nefarious activity”.
To me, it seems to be saying two different things.
1. EP is a suspect because she cooked the meal.
2. Police also are considering an accidental poisoning alongside potential nefarious activity. (Not directly referring to her like they referred to her in the first sentence).
I don't know which way to make sense of what they wrote.
Or is he separating the nefarious activity from poisoning altogether? The nefarious activity being something they discovered in the course of the investigation, but having nothing to do with the deaths.
A possible connection with the dehydrator either way.
He does seem to be ruling out ingestion elsewhere than Erin's lunch.
Last edited: