Very thorough post! I do though disagree with some of what you have analysed:
- Initially, the husband was a POI
- Later it changed to him not being a POI
- And subsequently it became "no comment" (and still is). At no point in time have QPS said that they believe he had no involvement in this case (like I have seen in other cases where one partner has gone missing or has been murdered and the remaining partner has been "cleared' by police fairly quickly)
- When the body was located, Det Insp Ainsworth said on camera that they were treating this as an unlawful homicide, in fact, they had been treating it as such for some time. This IMO indicates that they knew fairly early into the investigation that she was murdered
- There has been a large focus on searching the BC families properties and cars, to the point of the cars being impounded for at least 6 weeks (one) and maybe even longer for the other one
- I don't believe for one moment that the husband has been ruled out by QPS
The video may have been a catalyst for some posters and also provoked a whole heap of animosity (to say the least) against these two families, in particular the display by the parents of GBC. Furthermore, the animal skulls displayed at the front of their home made it even worse! Many were outraged and very judgemental about the parents because of this and all sorts of assumptions started.
I still believe domestic violence is somehow in the picture and the husband's affair(s) is just because he had no respect, nor did he care for his wife.
All just my opinion.
thanks CC, I did say that he was first a POI then at day 3 (i think) he was no longer, but I didnt mention how he has since been a POI due to the 'no comment' comments, which indicate he is and is suss in itself. The reason I didn't go further into what he was being considered as NOW, was that I was really focusing on those initial days and trying to point out that at this time, QPS were not looking at him. Even that morning when they were informed she was missing, I feel that they did not think GBC was suspicious, based on those comments from my post. So it led me to believe that something else caused them concern. They talked to GBC that morning, so I think something he told them made them very worried, because he said he was very worried. Am I making sense here? Im trying!! MOO :moo:
I also think that what was uncovered that morning could well have made the QPS believe they would be looking at a homicide, I just don't see evidence to imply that GBC was behind it, so I back you up on the unlawful homicide comment too. MOO :moo:
as for the cars, I agree that there is something of interest, some evidence that Allison was in one of those cars, and perhaps after she dies, or evidence of places the car/s had been that night, with or without her in them. MOO :moo:
The BC family homes...I wonder if this is standard procedure for people of interest, and now I wonder whether they raided the seniors based on old man at bus stop, rather than what I first thought, which was, GBC had evidence there. MOO:moo:
I sound like I am all for GBC's innocence today...and I have made a point of trying to identify points that would protest his innocence. This is not because I believe it, it is because I am doing a little bit of eliminating. If anyone can disprove any of the comments I post, then we can safely say he is not innocent. MOO :moo:
