I mean if the police were fooled by a silver tongue
Or were taken in by something like 'my father NBC is on the same board as commissioner Atkinson so please just leave'?
I mean if the police were fooled by a silver tongue
MG is the info from an American website, as I don't think we have degrees of murder here.
exactly CC...so the chances of police coming then leaving without sighting Allison are only going to be applicable if DV was not an issue within this marriage.
IMO I think puts to rest the thought that Allison was not there if they turned up that night.
In other words, I believe that Allison was alive and well when the police (if the police) were called out that night for a disturbance at their home. If they turned up, they stayed to make sure she was ok MOO :moo:
At the very beginning of this investigation the Police Superintendent said "We are treating this as an Unlawful Homicide". I found those words curious as I thought all homicides were 'unlawful'.I did some searching and found this article useful. I'm not sure if it Australian formation but can't see that that would effect the definition. I Moo loudly here .
Murder vs. Manslaughter
Killing another person is commonly referred to as murder. However, the precise term for the killing of one person by another is homicide. Murder is a form of criminal homicide that has a precise legal meaning. Murder is usually defined as the "unlawful killing of another with malice aforethought (or "an abandoned and malignant heart"). Malice aforethought refers to the perpetrator's intention of doing harm.
There are different legal variations of murder, known as degrees. Degrees of murder vary by the gravity (seriousness) of the offense (usually measured by the intent of the perpetrator) and the sentence assigned to that offense. For example, murder in the first degree, or first-degree murder, carries the sternest sentences and is usually reserved for murders committed with premeditation or extreme cruelty.
Manslaughter is also a form of criminal homicide. The difference between murder and manslaughter is in the element of intent. In order to commit voluntary manslaughter, a person must have committed a homicide, but have acted in the "heat of passion." This mental state must have been caused by legally sufficient provocation that would cause a reasonable person of ordinary temperament to lose self-control. To convict a person of manslaughter, it must be proved that the person who committed the homicide had adequate provocation (this cannot involve words alone), acted in the heat of passion, and lacked the opportunity to cool that passion. There must also be a connection between the incident of provocation, the heat of passion, and the act that caused the homicide.
Involuntary manslaughter is manslaughter resulting from a failure to perform a legal duty expressly required to safeguard human life, from the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to a felony, or from the commission of an act involving a risk of injury or death that is done in an unlawful, reckless, or grossly negligent manner. Involuntary manslaughter is a relatively new legal concept. Its exact definition varies greatly by jurisdiction, and is sometimes known as second- or third-degree manslaughter.
In order to convict someone of either murder or manslaughter, the distinct elements of each crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the actions of the perpetrator cannot be explained or excused by any legal defense, excuse, or justification. Murder and manslaughter also differ in the sentences imposed for each crime. As the perpetrator of manslaughter is assumed to have evidenced less mental culpability, the sentence for manslaughter is usually less than that for murder.
Mani you are correct. I've been on a jury in a murder trial in Australia. Murder is murder.
Or were taken in by something like 'my father NGB is on the same board as commissioner Atkinson so please just leave'?
Thanks Rational! your story made ME think too, about something we've talked about in earlier threads, that I personally believe could be relevant
I really feel that its possible GBC and ABC still loved each other...maybe deeply. I know we believe he is a and a tosser and has cheated on her more times than we could count.... these are all character flaws we believe he has, but in all reality we don't know the full story really, as usually we go in search of the seedy info.
But that doesnt mean that arsewipes can't love deeply too (sorry I made a deal with myself to stop swearing on this forum today!!!) I think its quite possible that he loved Allison completely and intensely and perhaps this is where his problems lay. Some men (maybe women too, I dont know about that part) fall in love with someone they perceive to be above them (and they usually are in these cases) ie. the 'settler' and the 'reacher'
It may be that Allison settled, and GBC reached. and when the male feels inferior to the woman he loves so deeply, he gets very resentful. And nasty. And sometimes cheats to build himself up again.
I know we aren't discussing this avenue at the moment, but does anyone think their relationship may have had some of these qualities?
Also, another area of discussion which is kind of along these lines was the possibility that GBC was a sex addict..does anyone have much info on that? if you respone, I swear I wont think you are a sex addict :floorlaugh:
So why would the police have initially said Allison may have been dead as early as 8pm? I'm really not sure about the rumour that they attended that night I must admit. I honestly don't see why it wouldn't have been in the media - so many other things have been reported and alluded to that could incite a "lynch mob" and also affect the children - why not this? Not sure that it happened.
I understand what you are saying but also believe that sometimes even neighbours are not aware of DV. It isn't always loud. IMO
Thank you....that's what I was after :rocker:
My humble apologies.... she says as she slumps away shoulders down head hung low in shame and embarrassed yet again. I have demoted myself to 'sleuth lurker' from this point forth... :banghead:
There's references in past threads to neighbours having heard disturbances in the past at the BC home. That could be consistent with the counselling the couple were allegedly undergoing, if it involved forced nightly discussions as a prev poster said. A jilted/hurt wife trying to get compassion or sympathy/commitment from a cheating egotist (which might be what GBC was IMO) would likely cause some shouting.
Neighbours have definitely given a lot of information to police. From Day One.
I don't have evidence of who killed Allison but I can assure you GBC is no 'silver tongue' from any reports. If anyone thinks police have been mislead or confused by something GBC has said, this is something you can be sure hasn't happened.
A year or two might pass before charges are laid, particularly where a connection to an accomplice is being investigated. They've got to get this right, first and only time. A couple of months isn't reason to panic that the investigators have nothing ... They have p-l-e-n-t-y.
My guess is that the eventual case will involve a son and father, underlying financial motivation, heat of the moment anger/confusion, then panic, coupled with unexpected witnesses and a lack of support from people who might be expected to help the perpetrators when everything comes out. Completely JMO. I have no evidence who the murderer/accomplice is.
There's references in past threads to neighbours having heard disturbances in the past at the BC home. That could be consistent with the counselling the couple were allegedly undergoing, if it involved forced nightly discussions as a prev poster said. A jilted/hurt wife trying to get compassion or sympathy/commitment from a cheating egotist (which might be what GBC was IMO) would likely cause some shouting.
Neighbours have definitely given a lot of information to police. From Day One.
I don't have evidence of who killed Allison but I can assure you GBC is no 'silver tongue' from any reports. If anyone thinks police have been mislead or confused by something GBC has said, this is something you can be sure hasn't happened.
A year or two might pass before charges are laid, particularly where a connection to an accomplice is being investigated. They've got to get this right,
first and only time. A couple of months isn't reason to panic that the
investigators have nothing ... They have p-l-e-n-t-y.
My guess is that the eventual case will involve a son and father, underlying financial motivation, heat of the moment anger/confusion, then panic, coupled with unexpected witnesses and a lack of support from people who might be expected to help the perpetrators when everything comes out. Completely JMO.
I have no evidence who the murderer/accomplice is.
So why would the police have initially said Allison may have been dead as early as 8pm? I'm really not sure about the rumour that they attended that night I must admit. I honestly don't see why it wouldn't have been in the media - so many other things have been reported and alluded to that could incite a "lynch mob" and also affect the children - why not this? Not sure that it happened.
I think my husband and I both thought we were settling, lol.
Thanks Thinking....excellent point...I have no idea and that throws it all out the window!
It is an actual fact that the police felt she may have been killed as early as 8pm.....
therefore if the police visited the house that night, and THAT could still be quite possible....it was NOT for a domestic, because if it was, there is your proof that they didnt demand to see her at that point, which is not normal procedure
so if they didnt see her, and left, it would mean the last OFFICIAL sighting of her was at the hairdressers.....
is it really likely the police would leave if hubby said she took off but was fine, just angry? I guess it could be especially if they had a squizzy around and couldnt see her, but I would like to hear more opinions on this...
If they did come and she wasnt there, and they were told she had gone walking...this might back up the gone for a walk if both cars were there at that time
THANKS THINKING my freaking head is spinning and confused so I will have to take a break to rethink this bit...you have made a really important point here...to me anyway