RSBM (re: SS calling a cab the previous night) ... And, there was no computer record of a taxi being called by Sarah Spiers that night. Even if her job was canceled, the record stays in the system with a cancelled message and an added notation indicating who cancelled the job.
RSBM (re: SR claims of receiving SS job the previous night)... The whole rang through, cancelled, received new job thing is simply not true. There was no evidence of her calling at all. He said in that letter he got a job with her name SARAH SPIERS on the job. Not true. Not in the computer records. Cancelled jobs stayed in the system as cancelled. They could not be deleted.
RSBM (re: SS call on night she went missing) ... I did search the job. I did find the job. I know exactly what was recorded on the computer system, the car dispatched, the time stamp, call duration etc. I know the telephonist who took the call. I know the baseroom supervisors and board members who listened to the audio.
I guess proof of what I say about SR is out there. Swans had no records to back his story. HE has no records to back his story.
Fact: Due to the computer dispatch technology in place at that time there is NO WAY SR was dispatched the job in the manner he said. Swan Taxis knew this. The police knew this. That is why he has not been taken seriously and his claims were not able to be substantiated. The only people who gave credence to his claims were the media as they love a good circus.
Originally Posted by JoWa #1336
So to clarify.
1. SR never had SS in his taxi on either night, as there was no record of any taxis going to known SS addresses, except the one she didn't get to take.
2. Only driver and dispatch knew she had called for taxi (no two way announcement).
So the computer screen only shows details for that taxi, not for other taxis?
Thank you for clearing that up. It takes one scenario off the table.
Reply POSTED by Bunnie #1375 Thread 13
correct. The taxi screen only shows the driver the job they are allocated. The job was not called over a two way radio.
POSTED by BUNNIE #1321 Thread 13
As for SR, that is why his claims were dismissed, and why suspicion fell on him quite quickly. His claims were very embellished, and factually wrong.
BUT... and this is my ONLY query relating to the phone call or SR or anything else at this stage -
WHY would Bunnie claim the destination SS requested to go was SOUTH PERTH when Police, Missing Persons, CI etc have claimed, and are still claiming (as per Crimestoppers etc) she requested to go to MOSMAN PARK?
Only one of them is right... Which one is it?