Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #21

[Annalise]

Hi Jackman - I get the impression EE lives on the outskirts of Perth and it makes me wonder if she still practices law. Maybe not the big city lawyer. Living a quiet life. Maybe in seclusion. MOO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Annalise]

Hi Marylouise 911 - maybe EE is deceased! I know the police said they spoke to her but that could be a cover up to keep information from the public.MOO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[lampformypath]

Hi Marylouise 911 - maybe EE is deceased! I know the police said they spoke to her but that could be a cover up to keep information from the public.MOO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh what an awful thought Annalise! But anything is possible of course. I pray she is still very much alive and hiding, in a very safe place!

 

[Annalise]

Oh what an awful thought Annalise! But anything is possible of course. I pray she is still very much alive and hiding, in a very safe place!

So sorry - that is an awful thought. I do hope she is safe[emoji92][emoji94]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo.au]

Perhaps EE has changed her name. If that's the case perhaps went back to her single name or something completely different. What about changing her Christian name and surname.

EE is young enough to still work.

Went through the list of certified legal practitioners http://www.lawalmanac.dotag.wa.gov....al_practitioners.aspx?uid=6765-1807-9234-7333
And the updated list upon the Legal Practice Boards website https://www.lpbwa.org.au/Practising-Certificates/Search-the-legal-profession-in-Western-Australia
No one by the same first name appears.
An interesting list though. I see that Billy Harris is still listed as practicing. That's 50 years, if true!

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[janwa]

Went through the list of certified legal practitioners http://www.lawalmanac.dotag.wa.gov....al_practitioners.aspx?uid=6765-1807-9234-7333
And the updated list upon the Legal Practice Boards website https://www.lpbwa.org.au/Practising-Certificates/Search-the-legal-profession-in-Western-Australia
No one by the same first name appears. An interesting list though. I see that Billy Harris is still listed as practicing. That's 50 years, if true! Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

I thought the only connection was the statement that she worked for a legal firm. Which to me suggests a receptionist or legal clerk rather than a lawyer, a journalist would state lawyer in order to give the article more impact.. Also have not seen anything that qualifies that she was married to BRE. She may have married after splitting with BRE so is hidden behind another name now.

 

[aequitas]

I thought the only connection was the statement that she worked for a legal firm. Which to me suggests a receptionist or legal clerk rather than a lawyer, a journalist would state lawyer in order to give the article more impact.. Also have not seen anything that qualifies that she was married to BRE. She may have married after splitting with BRE so is hidden behind another name now.

yes, she was apparently a secretary and not a lawyer. But it is very common for lawyers and secretaries to socialise including across firms. The legal community is about 2 degrees of separation at any time.

 

[petedavo.au]

I think it is quite telling that right from the day of arrest there has been absolutely no digital trace of EE. Her name is unique, Perth is small, she has clearly been in Australia for almost 30 years, yet there is nothing online at all.

She may have just been "anti-technology". I have a family member who is in his 60s and doesn't have email or any kind of online presence and chooses that lifestyle, so it is plausable.

But... To not even have a picture? Or anyone known to her, verify her existance other than the media interview as mentioned above and a colleague possibly taking a lift from her and the accused.

IMO I think she may be a key witness to the case.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Everything I found online suggests that this is not true. As hinted at in previous threads, with a rhetorical question about whether the CSK case went quiet because of the advent of internet contact sites where the perpetrator might of found other legal ways to find amenable people to satisfy his desires, so this was a hint as to where to find a myriad of peoples online presence. Google doesn't crawl these sites, as they are membership walled. Mind you that these profiles upon dating sites, might of been put up by an ex partner stalking her in revenge, so I have decided to remove the link. If so, then that might explain why.
BTW why is everyone spelling her name incorrectly?

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[lampformypath]

Everything I found online suggests that this is not true. As hinted at in previous threads, with a rhetorical question about whether the CSK case went quiet because of the advent of internet contact sites where the perpetrator might of found other legal ways to find amenable people to satisfy his desires, so this was a hint as to where to find a myriad of peoples online presence. Google doesn't crawl these sites, as they are membership walled. Mind you that these profiles upon dating sites, might of been put up by an ex partner stalking her in revenge, so I have decided to remove the link. If so, then that might explain why.
BTW why is everyone spelling her name incorrectly?

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

Thanks Pete for that information. I was starting to doubt myself about how to spell EE's name

<modsnip: info/link removed due to suppression order of the court>

)Hope I'm not breaking any rules here SB, just found it interesting about her name).
​

 

[Sillybilly]

According to Websleuths rules, the ex-wife and daughter are off-limits for sleuthing.

Not only is BRE's ex-wife considered a family member but there is potential that she could be a witness.

You may discuss what has been said in MSM about these people but you may not sleuth them and post about it on Websleuths. You may speculate within reason based on known fact, but you may not insinuate or directly accuse them of somehow being complicit in a crime.

 

[Jackman]

There&#8217;s probably multiple reasons why people don&#8217;t revert back to their single name.

* Preference to have the same name as any child/children.
* Paperwork involved in changing the name (banks, passport etc).
* Prefers the surname - dislikes the single name
* an ex-husband/in-law asked the surname be changed (digging heals in, knows it annoys them)
* Doesn&#8217;t want people to know they are separated/divorced
* Is not actually divorced
* Certificates obtained whilst within the marriage containing the married name.

How do people get on with certificates gained whilst married, and the surname changes?

All just my opinion of course.

 

[lampformypath]

There&#8217;s probably multiple reasons why people don&#8217;t revert back to their single name.

* Preference to have the same name as any child/children.
* Paperwork involved in changing the name (banks, passport etc).
* Prefers the surname - dislikes the single name
* an ex-husband/in-law asked the surname be changed (digging heals in, knows it annoys them)
* Doesn&#8217;t want people to know they are separated/divorced
* Is not actually divorced
* Certificates obtained whilst within the marriage containing the married name.

How do people get on with certificates gained whilst married, and the surname changes?

All just my opinion of course.

Hi Jackman, I found this site about change of name by Deed Poll and Title Deeds, seems to be a pretty standard thing as they have forms for it?

https://www0.landgate.wa.gov.au/docvault.nsf/web/PS_TR_HOWTOGUIDES/$file/Landgate-How-To-Guide-Change-name-by-change-of-name-cert.pdf

Just wanted to add this too, might be useful information.

https://www0.landgate.wa.gov.au/docvault.nsf/web/PS_TR_HOWTOGUIDES/$file/Landgate-How-To-Guide-Separation-or-Divorce-web.pdf

 

[petedavo.au]

https://twitter.com/WA_Police/status/959226352099500033

https://www.vindecoderz.com/EN/check-lookup/6T172SV2109318479

Something appears to of gone wrong with the VIN.

2005 Corolla, instead of a 1992 Camry.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[lampformypath]

https://twitter.com/WA_Police/status/959226352099500033

https://www.vindecoderz.com/EN/check-lookup/6T172SV2109318479

Something appears to of gone wrong with the VIN.

2005 Corolla, instead of a 1992 Camry.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

Now that's just weird??

 

[Jackman]

https://twitter.com/WA_Police/status/959226352099500033

https://www.vindecoderz.com/EN/check-lookup/6T172SV2109318479

Something appears to of gone wrong with the VIN.

2005 Corolla, instead of a 1992 Camry.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

PD,

In the past, did anyone notice that particular Vin belonged to a Corolla 2005?

Vin 72SV2109318479

Are WAPOL looking for the wrong vehicle? Perhaps the reason why they couldn&#8217;t locate it. The 2005 Corolla wasn&#8217;t built when SS went missing.

Is it possible to swap Vin numbers between vehicles? Does anyone have an explanation for the discrepancy?

 

[petedavo.au]

PD,

In the past, did anyone notice that particular Vin belonged to a Corolla 2005?

Vin 72SV2109318479

Are WAPOL looking for the wrong vehicle? Perhaps the reason why they couldn’t locate it. The 2005 Corolla wasn’t built when SS went missing.

Is it possible to swap Vin numbers between vehicles? Does anyone have an explanation for the discrepancy?

Could be an error with either the Police's Post or the vin look-up website. I suspect the former, as the police are always posting LOTBK internally and simply whoever was on duty making the social media posts that day copied and pasted from the wrong source document. At a guess.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[Marylouise911]

Could be an error with either the Police's Post or the vin look-up website. I suspect the former, as the police are always posting LOTBK internally and simply whoever was on duty making the social media posts that day copied and pasted from the wrong source document. At a guess.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

Revscheck.com - the link isn't working but a quick search on that VIN states Toyota Camry. If anyone's keen to pay for a PPSR for more information go ahead.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo.au]

I hunted around social media for the relevance of the Toyota Camry and found these
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/csk-thread-closed-again.1131135/page-29

<modsnip>

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...aremont-suspect-delayed-again.1180884/page-48

<modsnip>

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo.au]

Revscheck.com - the link isn't working but a quick search on that VIN states Toyota Camry. If anyone's keen to pay for a PPSR for more information go ahead.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

In that case it's the Vin look-up website that returns a corolla erroneously. Thanks. That settles it.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[Jackman]

Im going to speculate that the accused had met someone else who fell pregnant.
He then filed for divorce, waited with bated breath and mental disheaval.
Once the Fountain house was sold, moved in with parents.
Time passed, an agreement was moved in at a suitable time.
Snipped for brevity
http://www.news.com.au/national/cou...n/news-story/182cde6ee9022a03a731d77dac9af08d

That speculation makes sense and the timing is possible. I&#8217;d think, after the accused was arrested, all family members were probably sternly advised not to speak to the media. The media would have then needed to gain information from various certificates,which may not have reflected all of the information. The media weren&#8217;t in a position to interview people who could have provided specific light on the subject.

Thinking about the proposed speculation does shed a whole new light on the subject and provides a possible reason for the &#8220;unusual&#8221; living arrangements.

Also, not all children know that their parents were married beforehand!

JMO