Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996-1997, Perth, Western Australia - #8 ARREST*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi All New to posting but have lurked and followed this case for a few years now on sleuths. Just a quick survey on how many of you think that if BE is the csk how many of you think there is definately more victims out there than the 3 girls and the two rape cases. My self I definately think he has definately offended lots more before and after I just can't seeing him being able to stop after this.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
 
KS is a piece of work, was just told another story about him yesterday, yes the west is now used to push his financial investments such as mining equipment and apartment developments etc. Thankfully written media will be dead soon as is merely a business tool for him.

I'm lost. KS must mean Stokes. How is his financial motivation related to the CSK case?
 
I don't think there is much chance that CG did not fight back, she knew of the abductions and a body had been found, she knew he was going to almost certainly kill her and she was feisty by many reports.
Someone posted on here recently that CG had a fractured skull.
 
Hi All New to posting but have lurked and followed this case for a few years now on sleuths. Just a quick survey on how many of you think that if BE is the csk how many of you think there is definately more victims out there than the 3 girls and the two rape cases. My self I definately think he has definately offended lots more before and after I just can't seeing him being able to stop after this.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

I can't help but think the now ex-wife has something to do with the focus on BE. Perhaps that relationship fulfilled BE's needs, so maybe as with the BTK he was able to go without killing for many years. I'm always sceptical of friend of a friend stories but <modsnip>. I'm also curious as to why the stepdaughter would be staying with BE instead of her biological mother.
 
Potential BE event between 90-92 within 10 km's of Huntingdale. Twice Police were apathetic and directed me toward FOI application. Is there a way for me bypass the police drones in reporting this? Crimestoppers looks like the only other avenue.

If police are directing you towards FOI applications, doesn't that mean you are wanting them to provide you with information?

Regardless, contact Bret Christian if you think relevant information is being dismissed. If he thinks your story is relevant, maybe he'll publish a vague version and mention police seem disinterested. It worked for the motorist who saw a man masturbating at Rowe Park and for the bricklayer who saw a taxi pulling off Pippidinny at 4:30am.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/292980481/POST-Newspaper-for-12th-of-December-2015

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wes...k=3651020013e618b123527c7205b53f48-1441278161
 
Well it seems they matched DNA up from not 1, not 2, but 3 seperate crimes committed in completly different years. I would suggest that is a pretty clear cut picture that Bradley Edwards is going to be convicted. I mean having your DNA at one crime scene could be an accident, at two crime scenes is a coincidence?, well three is a series? So I would consider the case closed. Bradley Edwards is the Claremont Serial Killer!

It seems pretty certain that the victims were taken via Blitz attack from a secluded spot. There seems to be the same three (3) people commenting over and over again that this could not be the case and that the victims must have willingly got in the vehicle.. not sure why these people continue to reinforce this view over and over again page after page.

I think BE waited in a dark area and used sudden force to incapacitate the victim. He probably used a whole range of tactics from strangulation to king hitting and using a type of tool or weapon. Then i would gather he tied or bound the victim and bungled them into the car before taking them to the rape location. I would assume they were killed at the dump spot via some other means eg. Strangling again or cutting their throats.





Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
Well it seems they matched DNA up from not 1, not 2, but 3 seperate crimes committed in completly different years. I would suggest that is a pretty clear cut picture that Bradley Edwards is going to be convicted. I mean having your DNA at one crime scene could be an accident, at two crime scenes is a coincidence?, well three is a series? So I would consider the case closed. Bradley Edwards is the Claremont Serial Killer!

It seems pretty certain that the victims were taken via Blitz attack from a secluded spot. There seems to be the same three (3) people commenting over and over again that this could not be the case and that the victims must have willingly got in the vehicle.. not sure why these people continue to reinforce this view over and over again page after page.

I think BE waited in a dark area and used sudden force to incapacitate the victim. He probably used a whole range of tactics from strangulation to king hitting and using a type of tool or weapon. Then i would gather he tied or bound the victim and bungled them into the car before taking them to the rape location. I would assume they were killed at the dump spot via some other means eg. Strangling again or cutting their throats.





Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Could you please elaborate on the 3 lots of DNA from 3 separate crimes. Do you mean the kimono, the kk rape and CG?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
 
Hi all. I'm fairly new here, but have lurked a fair while on the CSK threads. Up until now, most of the stuff I've come up with ends up being discovered by someone else already. Just wanted to post some things here that I've been looking up.

Firstly, do we know BE's date of birth? Secondly, do we know the address he lived in Huntingdale? These questions lead me to the following:

Going by the previous website posted with some GPS coordinates, you feed them into google and get this location, which is very near to Gay Street. This is from (with the help of other posts here), possibly a Lowrance GlobalNav 212, which was released around 1998, possibly provided to BE as he was a Telstra tech, possibly operating on the outskirts of the city.

These GPS coordinates, when fend into Landgate's mapping tool, gives us some aerial photographs:

1985
1995
2000

There is one house apparent in 1985 near that location (now Pearce Ct) and two in the 1995 photo, those houses are 164 and 172 Gay Street. Those GPS coordinates relate to a spot that is that back parts of 164 Gay Street.

Now, keeping in mind that GPS coordinates could be out by about 156m, I ask the question: why did he submit those coordinates (if that's really him) to that website I assume he used the GPSS software), but its entirely strange to me why you would submit your personal address (if this is even his address) and not just some random address.

Also, using wayback machine on http://www.gpss.co.uk (the site posted is a mirror), his name was added to that database sometime between February 24th 1999 (when the listing was just all names) and August 17th 2000 (when the listings were split into countries and BE appears.

Any thoughts?
 
I disagree with the theories about phone tapping. I think that theory is overcomplicating things. While I believe the CSK may have used his job to his advantage, I think he would have exploited just the obvious, eg: company car, having a sense of 'authority' as working for this company and the knowledge of the local land gained from driving a lot on the job.

To suggest he was tapping phones and some techie mastermind is probably giving too much credit. I know he is a gamer & web admin and he may have had the knowledge of tapping phones, but it sounds overcomplicating to me. We know with other conmen & serial killers they have a way of turning on the charm & using uniforms to appear authorative to the general public.

It has been stated several times in previous CSK threads that BE originally came onto the task force's radar because he had been offering girls lifts in his car.

I believe he would drive laps around the area & when he spotted the girls alone by the payphones he would pull up (who would think twice at a Telecom payphone & seeing the Telecom driver ?) strike up a chat & casually offer a lift. Or he could've exited the car to pretend to tinker with the phone box, then blitzed them. This method worked, he hit up that Clairemont phone box 3 times because it worked for him. After 3 times, he knew it was too risky to stick to that spot/MO.
 
Was this BE ever associated with KLAC as secretary's in 2013? If so, I have found a mobile number. Our kewdale way..
 
I can't help but think the now ex-wife has something to do with the focus on BE. Perhaps that relationship fulfilled BE's needs, so maybe as with the BTK he was able to go without killing for many years. I'm always sceptical of friend of a friend stories but <modsnip>. I'm also curious as to why the stepdaughter would be staying with BE instead of her biological mother.

[emoji888] i'm glad you asked this Q because I had already given quite some thought to that situation.

Research has proven that a perpetrator's presentation of theirself is typically most charming, friendly, trustworthy, nice in general, etc. They are known to continually groom as a way of winning confidence eg by befriending, by gifting etc. too good to be true - and it is.
It allows them into positions of trust where they can then obtain whatever it is they need to gain, and from that position they do most harm.

When the proverbial hits the fan, often no one believes their victim ... and i'm speculating in this instance, that victim is his wife with the restraining order).
I feel it is highly likely that she has probably not been too well as a consequence of her relationship with him, its termination, and further, her daughter's choice to stay put with the stepfather has very likely come as an extra huge slap in the face to mum - and this would suit him down to the ground. I mean, the wife was HIS "front", so how DARE she even try to remove the facade of a relationship he had come to masquerade behind.

Our children for the most don't like any change in what has become their comfort zone. The stepdaughter is early 20's and of mature enough age to decide for herself. It is also possible she has not been witness to her mother's reasons for leaving, as perps are also extremely calculated. The daughter may not believe the mother even if she had made known her reasons for leaving. At a family level the mother is likely being blamed for ALL of this because HE is a GREAT guy, always has been ...and his stepdaughter knows it!
Early after the arrest, there was media mention that BE and his stepdaughter intend to fight these charges against him!

There was some early thread mention of ladies clothing being purchased from his PC/account, and I dare say BE has bent over backwards to win his stepdaughter's confidence because he NEEDS the facade to continue and will now also need to maintain all the moral support he can.

(on the subject of clothing there has also been mention of unidentified clothing at disposal sites and i have another theory which i'll elaborate on ...soonish)
 
This thought crossed my mind as well, with a deeply religious mother there may be some restrictions that some young people are not comfortable with. The daughter and BE seemed to share an affinity for video games, GOT characters etc. So perhaps it is just that simple that they had more in common so they stayed together.

Yep, Occam's razor definitely applies here.

@sleuthlife

I agree with you that phone tapping is far too complicated and a stretch.
I thought BE had no previous links with the Claremont case? (read this in the ABC/on the wiki).
I think the idea of him doing some laps, scoping the area out and then pulling up to the victims does seem likely. If BE is indeed the MM then it is highly likely that he was scoping them out while they were still clubbing.

Until we get confirmation about this alleged restraining order, I think that is ultimately irrelvant to the discussion.
I don't think he would have been an abuser in his 'regular' relationship. I think BE is extremely good at maintaining a public facade.
 
Could you please elaborate on the 3 lots of DNA from 3 separate crimes. Do you mean the kimono, the kk rape and CG?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Yes, ofcourse I do.

1988 he dropped the Kimono whilst leaving an attempted rape in Huntingdale. Left his DNA. (Not linked to CSK untill a few weeks ago when they decided to test the Kimono for the very first time ever for DNA)

1995 he left DNA from the Karrakatta cemetery rape and abduction. This was most likely obtained from a rape kit at hollywood hospital where the victim ran to.

1997 he left DNA on Ciara Glennon and this DNA was identified as the 'stranger' DNA. Now i am certain (although we will find out during the trial) that this was not a complete profile or was atleast a damaged or partial profile. Dr Jonathon Whittaker made numerous visits to WA to work on the case, he was an LCN specialist which is mainly to do with rebuilding damaged or partial profiles into admissable or comparable DNA profiles.

These three events were all seperate, he made 3 mistakes and two of these were before he even started the CSK spree, then it was the LAST victim that happened to have the 'stranger' DNA on her so if he hadnt killed Ciara Glennon he may never have been caught. They might never have been able to link any of the CSK cases with either Karrakatta or the Huntingdale rape. He went for a 3rd kill which gave him the 'serial killer' tag and this 3rd kill will put him away forever.
 
@Shaunmill If you wanted to be taken seriously then you wouldn't talk in generalisations about corruption. That just makes you look like a paranoid nutter. If you have something specific to say then say it, and there needs to be some sort of logic to what you're saying. You're scared of authority, okay we get it. Talk about this case.

ok well i dont thin BE will last long as some sought of patsy , i cant see him playing video games ect being a elite level serial killer sorry or hightened rapist , and for the record Im paranoid they've threatened my kids
 
Just research ; david masters , who was charged with clarkes murder . And you can then realize how imo guess, the newspaper article attempts to link the two incidents . Ends up being that they were wrong but at the time it was a hopeful lead to capture masters who had killed clarke ,hope this helps.
Thanks for the article , would really like to see that mega story in the "west" newspaper . More is welcomed

.
I'm sorry for the quality of the photos, I hope you can read them - I'm not very good at this stuff.
Having lived in Perth all my life, I am of course fascinated by this case. But to find where he has been living was a real shock - my niece lived around the corner from his house about 5 years ago and my friend lives a few streets away and in fact I drove past the house on my way home from Christmas dinner last night - funnily enough it was all in darkness ;) D.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aMsa0a6SHELyH6l_2_Srdmw_rokVGe6FIJIh90cuINs/edit?usp=sharing
 
Hi Ive read back a lot on this thread and I saw a mention on fb of the victim in huntingdale I think it was...it appears that she completed suicide...her last fb post was sept this year which I wonder if it coincides with her case being reopened. Im not sure if Im allowed to share in her her name.
Without being too vague- there has been mention of this amongst my FB connections but it may be a different case. The woman who committed suicide in August this year was born in 1967, meaning she was 20-21 in 1988. The victim of the Huntingdale 1988 case was confirmed as an 18 year old?
 
According to the Gosnells SHS 30 yr Reunion FB page he went to Huntingdale PS, so presumably his parents lived in the local catchment for that school, and it is likely that he was still living with them in 1988 as he was only 19.

Interesting comment on that page by one of BE's classmates (let's call her X) that the girl standing in front of BE in the school photo was in the same year of law school as CG, that CG went out with someone whom X knew, and as a result X came to know CG. However there's no suggestion that BE had ever met CG through these connections.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
When did you attempt to report this? Not sure why you’d be directed to FOI application, thought that would be seeking information rather than reporting info? The time frame of the possible BE incident having occurred between 90-92 is large so if it was BE, he might not be able to be prosecuted for the incident without an approx date. It could still be investigated and provide Police with information if it was BE related incident, especially to help establish a timeline of BE’s ‘activities’. Plus, as a victim of the incident support services are made available.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
1,792
Total visitors
1,856

Forum statistics

Threads
599,578
Messages
18,097,006
Members
230,885
Latest member
DeeDee214
Back
Top