- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 39,716
- Reaction score
- 119,403
Do NOT try to out the identity of a Verified Insider. Any further attempts to do so will result in temporary or permanent loss of posting privileges.
I think it's also because of spook factor. The clown pic on his profile suggests he gets off on fear. What can possibly be more scary than a cemetery?!I don't totally disagree with you except I see none of those locations you mention as safer from the CSK's point of view to take the victims. I have often wondered "why Claremont" and I couldn't really put faith in the theories about him " having it in for the upper class" or "working at UWA" etc. I think the link with the KK rape victim puts Karrakatta squarely in focus for the murder location for all three missing/murdered victims and the reason he struck in nearby Claremont.
The first reason KK stands out as the location he took the victims is Familiarity. He'd been there before (allegedly) and had been successful in getting away with it. The location wasn't risky, but the 'leaving the victim alive there' part was.
Secondly, the chance of disturbance. I would say, beaches and river foreshores are poor choices because of fishermen (as you said) and some who like to go down there at night for odd reasons. People also often pull in to beach carparks to 'get high' before going to bed for the night or, if they'd "pulled" for the night, they'd park up for a bit of action. UWA, Kings Park would be out of the question IMO on this basis and the parks also had the risk of possible night functions e.g. hired them for parties etc.
Thirdly I would say the distance from the pickup location would have been very important. In a station wagon, as I said in a previous post, he would be very paranoid to be pulled over by the police with a living, moving victim. If the police pulled him over, it'd be hard to conceal a moving body in the back. KK is just a few backstreets away from the pickup location, unlike other locations you mentioned, such as the beaches, it's hard to see them being more convenient than KK.
Fourthly, Ease of access/exit. With numerous entrances, it could be conceived to be an ideal place because, unlike others there's plenty of entries he can take. If he was nervous because he'd had a car drive past on one occasion near, let's say Government rd entrance he could always pull around to the Smythe Rd entrance or Railway Rd.
Lastly I'd put the risk of the vehicle being spotted while parked in the mind of the CSK. McGilvray Park and other locations, while most likely very quiet at night, may have had the odd car driving nearby or the perceived risk in the CSK's mind. Assuming he's killing them there, the location would have to be one where the car can be parked out of any potential sight.
Overall I think the key factor here is, assuming the KK rape was done by the CSK, the familiarity and success he'd had there makes this the obvious choice for him over new, untested locations. I would suspect if he'd used another location it would have been because he got spooked on the way to KK and had to find an alternative.
I agreeI think it's also because of spook factor. The clown pic on his profile suggests he gets off on fear. What can possibly be more scary than a cemetery?!
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
> ...What can possibly be more scary than a cemetery?!
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
The police reported a familial link which as you would know is not 100% conclusive. And it will struggle to stand the rigours of our court process, IMO
Dont believe everything you read in a newspaper, especially if it starts with, it is understood, that's their out if it is incorrect. Oh imo
There's a difference between "think" and "know". I think the probability skews towards Brad being guilty but I don't know this. As far as I'm concerned he is innocent until proven guilty but in saying that I reserve my right to have an opinion - an opinion that may change as more information becomes available.If if you really 100% think that the police have their man then why continue to comment on this site at all.
The purpose of this site is to try and solve horrible crimes against people, if you truly believe it solved move one.
Cant wait for the trolls.
thanks.
I don't think it was degraded. It only degrades if exposed to harsh elements. I just don't think they had the technology back then. It predates even gel methods. I think it's back when they did ABO.
If it was a semen stain they'd have plenty of DNA.
It's the DNA from CG that may have been a problem. News says it was taken from her body. Harsh elements over 3 weeks of not being found would have caused a lot of degradation. Depending on where they found it. If we assume it was from her genital area then that's the first place decomposition happens because of bacterial activity.
Again....We'll have to wait and see.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
A really perplexing question. Could it just be his really unique/specific MO rather than DNA or car seat fibres?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well done TrueblueHello everyone, Trueblue2017 is now a verified insider in this case.
Please treat Trueblue2017 with respect.
Trueblue2017does not need to provide links to his posts and it's up to you whether to believe what Trueblue2017 posts or not.
Thank you.
Coldpizza
WS Administrator
A really perplexing question. Could it just be his really unique/specific MO rather than DNA or car seat fibres?
I think it's also because of spook factor. The clown pic on his profile suggests he gets off on fear. What can possibly be more scary than a cemetery?!
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
And of course the unlikely possibility that the real CSK has access to the exhibits, knew the accused, and was able to plant the accused DNA before they were retested.was BRE set up ,its worth looking at, every thing else has been gone over countless times
who would set BRE up
1 telstra worker with a grudge
2 police
3 cross contamination of DNA
4 DNA came from innocent contact