Found Deceased Australia - Elisa Curry, 43, Aireys Inlet, Melbourne, 30 Sept 2017 #1

[inkpink]

Sounds to me, that 'watching the footy with neighbours' may have been done at Elisa's house. With Elisa preparing to go to bed/saying she was going to bed at the time the neighbours left.

Police will also have the content of all of Elisa's text messages by now, and know what was contained in those.

It is possible that she may not have put her phone on charge overnight (I know I often forget) and grabbed it in the morning to take on a morning run, not realising the battery was about to go flat.

If it was, in fact, Elisa that was seen running at around 8am, that could correlate with potential plans to meet her husband and children back at the house at around 9am.

It was stated that the phone was off on Saturday night.

I agree though, could have gone flat.

 

[SouthAussie]

Insp Seel said there have not been any sightings of Mrs Curry since Saturday.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...r/news-story/d536644942a700774ace22805ab90ea6

I believe that may mean confirmed sightings. Nothing they can be absolutely sure of. But they are still scouring the ocean pathways and cliffs, and possibly sending divers out tomorrow.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...r/news-story/d536644942a700774ace22805ab90ea6

 

[ozazure]

I have some weak links to Airey's Inlet and she looked so familiar to me, that I started to wonder if I knew of her, but then I realised she reminds me of Rachel Griffiths!

I don't peg the husband as being a Sharpe type - I'd rather see this flat affect from a guy who is probably worn out from hoping his wife is going to be found, perhaps injured in the bush, any minute now, than a fake high pitched GBC simpering voice. The reality is the husband making this plea is nearly always for a purpose other than a plea making a difference to people sharing information. He's no dummy, he knows it too.

I really hope she is ok, no major accident, or anyone doing her harm.

 

[JLZ]

Sounds to me, that 'watching the footy with neighbours' may have been done at Elisa's house. With Elisa preparing to go to bed/saying she was going to bed at the time the neighbours left.

Police will also have the content of all of Elisa's text messages by now, and know what was contained in those.

It is possible that she may not have put her phone on charge overnight (I know I often forget) and grabbed it in the morning to take on a morning run, not realising the battery was about to go flat.

If it was, in fact, Elisa that was seen running at around 8am, that could correlate with potential plans to meet her husband and children back at the house at around 9am.

Was the football broadcast live? Because if it ended around 5:30, that's a long while for an after-party, if that's what the neighbour was doing still at Elisa's at 10pm.

 

[Fluffykins]

But where is the foundation for this in this case ? its all speculation based on nothing

I guess the foundation is the neighbour saying there were problems within the marriage; and she's in a better position than you or I to know that. There have also been a number of references throughout this thread to marital problems but I don't have the time to go back and hunt them out; you can do that by yourself if you wish.
The thing is, when a couple start having problems in their relationship, and there are kids and assets involved, it tends to go down a very predictable path.

 

[inkpink]

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...doorknocking-neighbours-in-elisa-curry-search

9News breaking news headlines

NewsNational
Police to start doorknocking neighbours in Elisa Curry search
By A Current Affair
7:00pm Oct 4, 2017
Where is Elisa?
1 / 20><
FTBJ
The search for missing Melbourne mother Elisa Curry will be turned over to police tomorrow as the SES stand down.

Melbourne's Operational Response Police will doorknock homes surrounding the Curry family&#8217;s beach house in Airey's Inlet in an effort to find out what happened to Ms Curry, who was last seen late on Saturday night.

She had dinner with a neighbour that night, and was last seen at 10.30pm by her neighbour.


Does this mean there has been no doorknocking thus far......

 

[*Verdigris]

Sounds to me, that 'watching the footy with neighbours' may have been done at Elisa's house. With Elisa preparing to go to bed/saying she was going to bed at the time the neighbours left.

Police will also have the content of all of Elisa's text messages by now, and know what was contained in those.

It is possible that she may not have put her phone on charge overnight (I know I often forget) and grabbed it in the morning to take on a morning run, not realising the battery was about to go flat.

If it was, in fact, Elisa that was seen running at around 8am, that could correlate with potential plans to meet her husband and children back at the house at around 9am.

Yes, it was finally dragged out that they were at the Curry's house.

And good points on the rest of your post...
I just wish it were certain whether or not is was her that morning.
And I'd really like to know who the witness was...

 

[Constableno1]

If Eliza's phone was switched off at 10.30pm and the neighbour is saying they last saw her at 10pm, I'm tipping that a neighbour had something to do with it. Very rarely does someone turn off their phone these days. I think someone who knew Eliza and knew she was alone that night took advantage of her. I believe that person left the gate open and the dog escaped. If I was the cops I would be looking into the neighbours who were with her that evening and anyone that those neighbours had told that Eliza was alone. That neighbour Robyn Briggs who told the cops that Eliza mentioned she had marrital problems looks like she might know something. If this neighbour (Robyn) went to work, did she have a male partner who went back to Eliza's house?

 

[Wendy8888]

I know... and tbh, I keep finding myself feeling sorry for her husband, but catch myself, because I don't want to then find out he's the one responsible.
That's why I want to rule him (any husband) out first...

I didn't follow Jill M's case, until after it was over, but I will say that the only case I ever felt from the start, that the husband (fiance) most *definitely did not* have anything to do whatsoever with his (soon to have been) wife's disappearance, was the Stephanie Scott case. That case still rips my heart to shreds. And I never, even for a second felt that AL-W had anything to do with it at all. That poor man. I don't know if he'll ever fully recover.
(Or her mum, with the added tragedy that followed last year. )

Anyway, I'm actually kinda leaning to Elisa's husband as being a simple victim here as well... just want to rule him out before I emote full sympathy.
Just a personal shield. Just looking for answers.

Agree. Jill’s partner wasn’t an option IMO...something about him when he spoke, but many others well need we say more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wendy8888]

Was the football broadcast live? Because if it ended around 5:30, that's a long while for an after-party, if that's what the neighbour was doing still at Elisa's at 10pm.

I didn’t get home until
Midnight from our gathering of friends


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[*Verdigris]

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...doorknocking-neighbours-in-elisa-curry-search

9News breaking news headlines

NewsNational
Police to start doorknocking neighbours in Elisa Curry search
By A Current Affair
7:00pm Oct 4, 2017
Where is Elisa?
1 / 20><
FTBJ
The search for missing Melbourne mother Elisa Curry will be turned over to police tomorrow as the SES stand down.

Melbourne's Operational Response Police will doorknock homes surrounding the Curry family’s beach house in Airey's Inlet in an effort to find out what happened to Ms Curry, who was last seen late on Saturday night.

She had dinner with a neighbour that night, and was last seen at 10.30pm by her neighbour.


Does this mean there has been no doorknocking thus far......

(bbm)

Oh my, I hope they just forgot to add the important phrase of "once again",
in between "police will" and "doorknock homes".

 

[SouthAussie]

Was the football broadcast live? Because if it ended around 5:30, that's a long while for an after-party, if that's what the neighbour was doing still at Elisa's at 10pm.

It was live here in SA. The Grand Final is usually broadcast live all around the country.

Perhaps the after-party had wound down by then, and Elisa was just sipping tea or coffee and chatting quietly with her neighbours. If she said she was going to bed as they were leaving, she may have been hankering to do that for a while. Hard to kick invited visitors out because you are tired.

 

[Trooper]

I know... and tbh, I keep finding myself feeling sorry for her husband, but catch myself, because I don't want to then find out he's the one responsible.
That's why I want to rule him (any husband) out first...

I didn't follow Jill M's case, until after it was over, but I will say that the only case I ever felt from the start, that the husband (fiance) most *definitely did not* have anything to do whatsoever with his (soon to have been) wife's disappearance, was the Stephanie Scott case. That case still rips my heart to shreds. And I never, even for a second felt that AL-W had anything to do with it at all. That poor man. I don't know if he'll ever fully recover.
(Or her mum, with the added tragedy that followed last year. )

Anyway, I'm actually kinda leaning to Elisa's husband as being a simple victim here as well... just want to rule him out before I emote full sympathy.
Just a personal shield. Just looking for answers.

I don't think she went missing, having fallen down a cliff while running that Sunday morning, early. I discounted almost immediately the story of her running on the Saturday night. That didn't have a lot of logic, for a runner.

I don't think she mizzled off into the bush to off herself, hiding her own body carefully. .. a difficult thing to do.

If one looks at Elisa, in the missing persons context. how big a risk was she ? as a victim of her own lack of concentration , and having an accident, that's about par, except her body isn't visible.

A non visible body, by it's very nature, of a missing person has to be considered as deliberately hidden. No one just evaporates.

Was she in a high risk category? a woman who took lifts from strangers, who picked up men passerby's, strangers, a woman who inhabited shady bars, and pubs, who's circle was tinged with parolees, drug dealers, etc.? no, obviously not.

She is a very very low risk victim. At her own home, her second home, among neighbors who know her, and socialised with her, and her with them. She drove her own car. Had her own phone, she was a runner, which signifies being out alone on deserted roads, and that element raises her level of risk to Medium Risk, low Medium because she ran in the morning, not that night, IF she ran. Even so, that is a risk element for women even though it is morning.

Her professional life was that of a stay at home mother, writing letters to newspapers, , signifying a point of view that , while somewhat irritating , wasn't outrageous ...still a very very low risk, EXCEPT from their husbands, in this your average stay at home mum is in the highest category of risk of them all, Domestic Violence Homicide. It isn't a long long improbable stretch to weigh up all these factors and it is reasonable to cast a skeptical eye on any missing woman stay at home mum's husband.

Re Tom Meagher. it was obvious from the moment he spoke that he knew nothing, ditto Aaron, Stephanie Scott's fiancé.. his body language told it all.

 

[SouthAussie]

I guess the foundation is the neighbour saying there were problems within the marriage; and she's in a better position than you or I to know that. There have also been a number of references throughout this thread to marital problems but I don't have the time to go back and hunt them out; you can do that by yourself if you wish.
The thing is, when a couple start having problems in their relationship, and there are kids and assets involved, it tends to go down a very predictable path.

Are you saying that when a couple has problems in their relationship, the husband usually murders the wife? Because that simply is not so imo. The high divorce rate indicates that.

 

[MattWriting]

Was the football broadcast live? Because if it ended around 5:30, that's a long while for an after-party, if that's what the neighbour was doing still at Elisa's at 10pm.

If Elisa was a Richmond Tigers fan like rest of the family, celebrating the victory would have happened long after the end of the game

10pm is an early finish - I went to the match and was still out on the town at 5.30am

 

[Hbayne]

I guess the foundation is the neighbour saying there were problems within the marriage; and she's in a better position than you or I to know that. There have also been a number of references throughout this thread to marital problems but I don't have the time to go back and hunt them out; you can do that by yourself if you wish.
The thing is, when a couple start having problems in their relationship, and there are kids and assets involved, it tends to go down a very predictable path.

One in three marriages end in divorce. Which means the majority of people Have "problems" in their marriage. Not asking you to look back at posts , the thread is not that long and can do that myself .

 

[Hbayne]

If Elisa was a Richmond Tigers fan like rest of the family, celebrating the victory would have happened long after the end of the game

10pm is an early finish - I went to the match and was still out on the town at 5.30am

Yes and " go the Tiges "

 

[Wendy8888]

I don't think she went missing, having fallen down a cliff while running that Sunday morning, early. I discounted almost immediately the story of her running on the Saturday night. That didn't have a lot of logic, for a runner.

I don't think she mizzled off into the bush to off herself, hiding her own body carefully. .. a difficult thing to do.

If one looks at Elisa, in the missing persons context. how big a risk was she ? as a victim of her own lack of concentration , and having an accident, that's about par, except her body isn't visible.

A non visible body, by it's very nature, of a missing person has to be considered as deliberately hidden. No one just evaporates.

Was she in a high risk category? a woman who took lifts from strangers, who picked up men passerby's, strangers, a woman who inhabited shady bars, and pubs, who's circle was tinged with parolees, drug dealers, etc.? no, obviously not.

She is a very very low risk victim. At her own home, her second home, among neighbors who know her, and socialised with her, and her with them. She drove her own car. Had her own phone, she was a runner, which signifies being out alone on deserted roads, and that element raises her level of risk to Medium Risk, low Medium because she ran in the morning, not that night, IF she ran. Even so, that is a risk element for women even though it is morning.

Her professional life was that of a stay at home mother, writing letters to newspapers, , signifying a point of view that , while somewhat irritating , wasn't outrageous ...still a very very low risk, EXCEPT from their husbands, in this your average stay at home mum is in the highest category of risk of them all, Domestic Violence Homicide. It isn't a long long improbable stretch to weigh up all these factors and it is reasonable to cast a skeptical eye on any missing woman stay at home mum's husband.

Re Tom Meagher. it was obvious from the moment he spoke that he knew nothing, ditto Aaron, Stephanie Scott's fiancé.. his body language told it all.

Awesome! Thank you putting in words what my head has been thinking [emoji3]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[*Verdigris]

I believe that may mean confirmed sightings. Nothing they can be absolutely sure of. But they are still scouring the ocean pathways and cliffs, and possibly sending divers out tomorrow.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...r/news-story/d536644942a700774ace22805ab90ea6

And if it has been definitely ruled-out, such as that woman has since come forward, and they know it wasn't Elisa, then I wish they'd report that for sure.
Unless they want to keep a potential perp feeling a bit smug...

 

[inkpink]

If Elisa was a Richmond Tigers fan like rest of the family, celebrating the victory would have happened long after the end of the game

10pm is an early finish - I went to the match and was still out on the town at 5.30am

You are wild and crazy!

I was up to 1am at my son's. Finished up having a card night and yes GO TIGERS....