another rough guess, my bet is money was the catalyst... as opposed to , say, sex , or religion... money that Borce needed and had to have , money he felt even entitled to.
do people kill their husband, or wife for $850?.... well. I am sure it has happened before....it wouldn't be the first time some one has said no and wound up dead on the kitchen floor over money, probably lesser amounts, too. ..
The last man in Victoria to be able to use the defence of 'my wife insulted my masculinity' for murder was Jamie Ramage.. his wife, Julie , who had never mentioned the matter ever before suddenly, according to Jamie , ( this was after she left him, got a boyfriend, moved into her own flat) said what a small appendage Jamie had and she was now enjoying better and more of that activity than she ever had with him. This is what Jamie claimed she said. And he was able to get away with strangling her, carting her body off to the Dandenong hills, shallow grave, leaving their school age daughter to become frantic looking for Mum, and got an 8 yr sentence.
Legislation has removed that genderist defence from the lawbooks, and way , way over time to do so.
So Borce can't use that one, now.
