Has it been explained, if true, why no clothing belonging to the little girl was found in the family home?
The hospital visit comes as Kiesha's grandfather Rodney Jones claimed he only found out his grand-daughter had gone missing when he saw the 6pm news.
"I saw it on the news and I wasn't sure, but I hoped it wasn't my Kiesha," he told The Sunday Telegraph.
"I called my son. Daniel, and he said that it was her, so I packed the bag and was in the car within half-an-hour.
"I drove straight to the police station at Mt Druitt."
Mr Jones, who lives in Canberra with his wife Tanya, is the father of Kiesha's mother, Kristi Abrahams.
He said his relationship with Kristi was good.
They talked often and she (sic) didn't think it was unusual that she didn't call him.
"She was probably busy worrying with the family and didn't have time to call," he said.
I wonder if bio dad is a suspect as well........
Search called off for Kiesha Abrahams
Police have called off their ground search for missing six-year-old Sydney girl Kiesha Abrahams.
The extensive air, ground and water search for the western Sydney girl has ended after seven days of police combing areas around her family's Mt Druitt unit.
Police announced on Sunday that the physical search has concluded, but Strike Force Jarocin will continue to investigate Kiesha's disappearance.
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-new...d-off-for-kiesha-abrahams-20100808-11pwd.html
This article has me srcatching my head, since in a report yesterday they said that they would not be giving up the search unless their manpower was needed elsewhere.
I have to think that they either found something on Richmond Rd last night (which I'm doubtful of since media would have been all over it), or someone has given them info that Kiesha has been handed off to someone else.
Especially in light of saying that she was seen a week before with a relative.
Why not say which relative? Aunt, uncle, mum, dad ?
And what neighbour was the witness? A neighbour in the street, or in the unit block? Since everyone was being doorknocked in the first few days, and there was a strong police presence, how could this neighbour not have known and spoken up sooner?
Todays paper shows a pic of mum and step-dad leaving the motel with the kids last night. Wonder if they were off for more questioning or just going to visit friends or relatives?
But Inspector Oxford says everyone is being considered a suspect at this stage.
The girl's mother and stepfather have been living in a nearby hotel, which he also questioned the wisdom of.
"I wonder if Kiesha happens to walk home, and who's there to wait for her?" he said.
Im thinking the search has been called off based on information gleaned during the past week. It depends what stage the police are up to in their investigation, what forensic results have come back etc, they may be at a standstill pending new information or be conducting further investigations or simply reviewing evidence. My instincts tell me an arrest is imminent (24-48hrs), however its not often that im right lol. Also, the credibility of the witness who alleges she saw Kiesha with a relative is important. That could have police looking at this matter in an entirely different light. Will be interesting to see if Mum, Dad and Step dad are re-interviewed anytime soon. Or if the mystery relative has been interviewed. There's probably a plausible explaination but like yourself im curious to know why we are only just learning about this neighbours information now.
Hmmm, and now I'm thinking of those 20 bags of evidence the police left with....and the computer. Hoping, hoping, hoping they found something of value that hints at Kiesha still being alive.