Australia Australia - Lynette Dawson, 34, Sydney, Jan 1982 *Arrest* #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
CD's lawyer will be an interesting choice.

I suggest Mr Lloyd Rayney from W.A.(Solicitor) - he is an expert in Judge Only trials and was acquitted of his own Murder charge against his wife Corryn Veronica Ann Rayney, née Da Silva (Court Registrar). Or, has Mr Lloyd Rayney been struck off as a lawyer ?

I remain fixed on this CD case............. and, other "cold cases" where evidence is required for a guilty conviction; so so many murderers wandering amongst us in Australia !!! IMHO

It is a huge land......... with many bodies buried in the bush.
 
He's not looking like a happy chappy

Nocookies

Seated in the window seat in row 30, the last row of seats on the plane, Mr Dawson occasionally spoke to police and had his breakfast on the 90-minute flight.

He was the first to board the plane for flight QF861, escorted by officers and wearing the same clothes he was arrested in but with the addition of a pair of thongs.

Detectives were seated beside and in front of him.

“Most of the flight he spent looking out the window. It was like a last taste of freedom,” a passenger said.

 
Nocookies

Seated in the window seat in row 30, the last row of seats on the plane, Mr Dawson occasionally spoke to police and had his breakfast on the 90-minute flight.

He was the first to board the plane for flight QF861, escorted by officers and wearing the same clothes he was arrested in but with the addition of a pair of thongs.

Detectives were seated beside and in front of him.

“Most of the flight he spent looking out the window. It was like a last taste of freedom,” a passenger said.


That was not the shirt he was wearing when arrested. Obviously it was purchased for him because as CH points out, he never wears collared shirts. Let’s hope we don’t start to see sloppy reporting in the media as a result of wanting to get their story out first.
 
BAIL ACT 2013 - SECT 19 Refusal of bail--unacceptable risk

BAIL ACT 2013 - SECT 19
Refusal of bail--unacceptable risk
19 Refusal of bail--unacceptable risk

(1) A bail authority must refuse bail if the bail authority is satisfied, on the basis of an assessment of bail concerns under this Division, that there is an unacceptable risk.

(2)For the purposes of this Act, an unacceptable risk that the accused person, if released from custody, will:

(a) fail to appear at any proceedings for the offence, or
(b) commit a serious offence, or
(c) endanger the safety of victims, individuals or the community, or
(d) interfere with witnesses or evidence.

(3) If the offence is a show cause offence, the fact that the accused person has shown cause that his or her detention is not justified is not relevant to the determination of whether or not there is an unacceptable risk.

(4) Bail cannot be refused for an offence for which there is a right to release under Division 2A.

BAIL ACT 2013 - SECT 19 Refusal of bail--unacceptable risk


He may very well get bail.. I wouldn't be surprised, on account of his age . I don't like it, but it would be a matter of the corrections board assessing the risk of imprisonment at his age.

But then, he has made a fool of the NSW police and the DPP of NSW for decades and they might just be huffy enough to pull out all the stops and make a strong case for incarceration on remand .
 
He may very well get bail.. I wouldn't be surprised, on account of his age . I don't like it, but it would be a matter of the corrections board assessing the risk of imprisonment at his age.

But then, he has made a fool of the NSW police and the DPP of NSW for decades and they might just be huffy enough to pull out all the stops and make a strong case for incarceration on remand .

I also think he may just get bail.......& I don't like it either :(
 
He may very well get bail.. I wouldn't be surprised, on account of his age . I don't like it, but it would be a matter of the corrections board assessing the risk of imprisonment at his age.

But then, he has made a fool of the NSW police and the DPP of NSW for decades and they might just be huffy enough to pull out all the stops and make a strong case for incarceration on remand .
Or else slap him with a ‘show cause offence’ courtesy of Joanne...I wish.
 
I remember sitting thru weeks /months of evidence at the siege inquest when they were "discussing" bail ( the reasons Monis was on bail etc ) ...............we heard absolutely everything there was to know about the bail Act 1978 & the new Bail Act 2013 ( which has been amended twice since than ) & I swore I never wanted to hear another thing about bail...............but here I am looking up the Bail Act again :rolleyes::rolleyes:

https://lylawyers.com.au/changes-in-bail-laws-impacted-on-sydney-siege/

Interesting read.......this gives a good summary
 
He may very well get bail.. I wouldn't be surprised, on account of his age . I don't like it, but it would be a matter of the corrections board assessing the risk of imprisonment at his age.

But then, he has made a fool of the NSW police and the DPP of NSW for decades and they might just be huffy enough to pull out all the stops and make a strong case for incarceration on remand .

The NSW police have made a worldwide laughing stock of themselves with this one Troops.
The world is looking at us now, all what, 27,000,000 viewers are seeing what’s going down in Aus.

I just can’t praise them on this and I’ll hang my head in shame for Lynette and her family who was let down badly by these bloody puppets.

Who had hold of the strings huh?
Who did the Dawson’s know?
 
The NSW police have made a worldwide laughing stock of themselves with this one Troops.
The world is looking at us now, all what, 27,000,000 viewers are seeing what’s going down in Aus.

I just can’t praise them on this and I’ll hang my head in shame for Lynette and her family who wasI let down badly by these bloody puppets.

Who had hold of the strings huh?
Who did the Dawson’s know?
I know. Just the fact that he moved a 16 year old into his house within days, should have merited some serious investigation.
I know that 16 is the age of consent, but I don't think it is for people with authority and influence over her.
She is a victim of his too.
 
CD's lawyer will be an interesting choice.

I suggest Mr Lloyd Rayney from W.A.(Solicitor) - he is an expert in Judge Only trials and was acquitted of his own Murder charge against his wife Corryn Veronica Ann Rayney, née Da Silva (Court Registrar). Or, has Mr Lloyd Rayney been struck off as a lawyer ?

I remain fixed on this CD case............. and, other "cold cases" where evidence is required for a guilty conviction; so so many murderers wandering amongst us in Australia !!! IMHO

It is a huge land......... with many bodies buried in the bush.

He was also Robert Hughes lawyer.

http://www.gregwalsh.com.au/hughes-v-the-queen-2017-hca-20-14-june-2017/
 
https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/acts/2014-52.pdf

Assessment of bail concerns

(1)A bail authority must, before making a bail decision, assess any bail concerns.

(2)For the purposes of this Act, a bail concern is a concern that an accused person, if released from custody, will:

(a) fail to appear at any proceedings for the offence, or
(b) commit a serious offence, or
(c) endanger the safety of victims, individuals or the community, or
(d) interfere with witnesses or evidence.

(3) If the accused person is not in custody, the assessment is to be made as if the
person were in custody and could be released as a result of the bail decision.

(4) This section does not apply if the bail authority refuses bail under Division 1A
(Show cause requirement).

18Matters to be considered as part of assessment

(1)A bail authority is to consider the following matters, and only the following
matters, in an assessment of bail concerns under this Division:

(a) the accused person’s background, including criminal history,
circumstances and community ties,
(b) the nature and seriousness of the offence,
(c) the strength of the prosecution case,
(d) whether the accused person has a history of violence,
(e) whether the accused person has previously committed a serious offence while on bail,
(f) whether the accused person has a history of compliance or non-compliance with bail acknowledgments, bail conditions, apprehended violence orders, parole orders or good behaviour bonds,
(g ) whether the accused person has any criminal associations,
(h) the length of time the accused person is likely to spend in custody if bail is refused,
(i) the likelihood of a custodial sentence being imposed if the accusedperson is convicted of the offence,
(j) if the accused person has been convicted of the offence and proceedings on an appeal against conviction or sentence are pending before a court,whether the appeal has a reasonably arguable prospect of success,
(k) any special vulnerability or needs the accused person has including because of youth, being an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, or having a cognitive or mental health impairment,
(l) the need for the accused person to be free to prepare for his or her appearance in court or to obtain legal advice,
(m) the need for the accused person to be free for any other lawful reason,
(n) the conduct of the accused person towards any victim of the offence, or any family member of a victim, after the offence,
(o) in the case of a serious offence, the views of any victim of the offence or any family member of a victim (if available to the bail authority), to the extent relevant to a concern that the accused person could, if released from custody, endanger the safety of victims, individuals or the community,
(p) the bail conditions that could reasonably be imposed to address any bail
concerns in accordance with section 20A.


(2)The following matters (to the extent relevant) are to be considered in deciding whether an offence is a serious offence under this Division (or the seriousness
of an offence), but do not limit the matters that can be considered:

(a)whether the offence is of a sexual or violent nature or involves the possession or use of an offensive weapon or instrument within the meaning of the Crimes Act 1900
(b) the likely effect of the offence on any victim and on the community generally,
(c) the number of offences likely to be committed or for which the person has been granted bail or released on parole.

Refusal of bail—unacceptable risk

(1) A bail authority must refuse bail if the bail authority is satisfied, on the basis of an assessment of bail concerns under this Division, that there is an unacceptable risk.

(2) For the purposes of this Act, an unacceptable risk is an unacceptable risk that
the accused person, if released from custody, will:

(a) fail to appear at any proceedings for the offence, or
(b) commit a serious offence, or
(c) endanger the safety of victims, individuals or the community, or
(d) interfere with witnesses or evidence.

(3) If the offence is a show cause offence,the fact that the accused person has shown cause that his or her detention is not justified is not relevant to the determination of whether or not there is an unacceptable risk.

(4) Bail cannot be refused for an offence for which there is a right to release under Division 2A.

Accused person to be released if no unacceptable risks
(1) If there are no unacceptable risks, the bail authority must:

(a) grant bail (with or without the imposition of bail conditions), or
(b)release the person without bail, or
(c)dispense with bail.

(2) This section is subject to Divisions 1A and 2A.
 
’She saw Lyn’: Lawyer’s shock claim

Outside the court today, Mr Dawson’s lawyer Greg Walsh told reporters there was evidence that Ms Dawson “was observed by a number of people” after her 1982 disappearance. “Unfortunately two of those people are deceased,” he said.

“One of the witnesses who died, her daughter gave evidence at the second inquest, and she said that ‘my mother told me (and) if she was here today, she’d say she saw Lyn Dawson after her disappearance’.

“Another witness also gave evidence to that effect.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
1,979
Total visitors
2,122

Forum statistics

Threads
602,521
Messages
18,141,880
Members
231,424
Latest member
arling
Back
Top