its another story throwing shade at the author (jealousy maybe?) for the wording....of some of his points...references and accusations.
again turning the story away from what it is.
it made me a tad angry.
you cant please everyone.
is she really gunna pull hairs over the name of a investigative documentary after all...without hedleys body of work there would be no taskforce Southwood investigating the whole sorry saga of sexual abuse of children on the northern beaches!
whats more important here really???
the use of term the teachers pet (which any adult can figuratively fathom doesn't mean kindergarten stuff
![Confused :confused: :confused:]()
)
or highlighting and bringing to the forefront a pandora's box of crime exposure now under investigation.
paleeeeeeeeease
![Eek! :eek: :eek:]()
joanne was imo well represented by Hedley.
most people comprehend
ultimately she was a victim in a complex web of love,control and passion that she was also a free participant.
joanne owns her own behaviour and actions, wants to right the wrongs and she is.
cant see the beat up from gemma.
all the right things are happening??
jmo