JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,355
I remember reading an article the other day that mentioned that the police who originally visited the site did not take care not to disturb the scene as at that stage there wasn’t reason to believe that Russell and Carol had been killed. I think it’s definitely possible that there are things that were missed but it also sounds like Lynn did as much as he could to ensure the evidence was gone when he left.
I find this take to be quite at odds with how evidence works in a criminal trial.
Why should Lynns story be believed by the Jury? If they don't believe it, the only natural and obvious inference is he murdered them - based on all the evidence.
I don't think the defence is anywhere close to establishing reasonable doubt but who knows.
MOO
SMH (paywall) (published 2 hours ago)
Prosecutors say it’s impossible that Gregory Lynn is innocent of murdering missing campers Russell Hill and Carol Clay.
Latest and Breaking News | The Sydney Morning Herald Live Australian and World News Feed
Here's hoping a unanimous jury agrees.