TootsieFootsie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 13,598
- Reaction score
- 91,350
Yes how did he know they were "having fun in bed". Did he peep ?
Not even just “having fun” but TRYING to have fun (purportedly). Which suggests he was pretty attentive and aware of what was happening… to an inexplicable degree unless he purposefully sought out to invade their privacy… which presents a possible MOTIVE….!Yes how did he know they were "having fun in bed". Did he peep ?
As I said before, JEALOUSY and INSECURITY right there….There are some people who seem to be outraged that older people would still be "having fun".
I've had this discussion before with people who seem to think that anyone over 50 would just be in a relationship for the company.
They've actually said that "old people doing IT is disgusting. Quite a few people think that way![]()
Perhaps that’s why the guns came out… the next closest thing GL had to assert male dominance and power….? Attack elderly folk having fun and terrorise then in the most dehumanising way at a time they least expected?? That would be a very good reason why he would not even thinking of going to police… and why he’d want to destroy every shred of evidence… and burn bodies…As I said before, JEALOUSY and INSECURITY right there….
Getting stalker/ pervert vibes here. Creepy.Yes how did he know they were "having fun in bed". Did he peep ?
Totally. Vouyerism, power, control, humiliation….Getting stalker/ pervert vibes here. Creepy.
And the phallic symbols (guns, planes) are possibly not just coincidental….Totally. Vouyerism, power, control, humiliation….
And remember all phones and the drone were missing…. All of which capture recordings and images….![]()
![]()
![]()
At the very least he was making fun of them, mocking them.To me that comment by GL smacks of arrogant contempt…. So inappropriate to even raise that… unless he was inadvertently betraying his real motive…
Yes, personally I find GLs account utterly unconvincing….![]()
Jury told to imagine being blamed for campers' deaths
Jurors have been asked to put themselves in the shoes of an airline pilot accused of killing two campers wh...www.9news.com.au
Jurors have been asked to put themselves in the shoes of an airline pilot accused of killing two campers when they retire to decide whether he is guilty of their murders.
Greg Lynn's barrister Dermot Dann KC asked a Supreme Court jury of 14 on Wednesday to contemplate what they would have done if their improper gun storage had led to the deaths of two people.
And remember, at that point he had no idea that they weren't a long-married couple.At the very least he was making fun of them, mocking them.