thegoogler
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 78
The timeline works out too.. Witness sees him throw the laptop into the canal around 4pm. Hes believed to have returned home around 7.20pm, 3 hour round trip. He must have had her dead body in the ute at that stage. I imagine he had already moved her car somewhere by then. Im thinking he must have moved her car again, i just dont see how he could have had enough time to kill her, clean up, dump her body 70km away AND dump her car and get back by 7.20pm. Either he moved it at a later date OR he had help. I suppose it is possible he moved her car first, it doesnt give him a lot of time though but that could explain his sloppiness.
If the car was in his garage from Sunday until the early hours of Wednesday morning, when he moved it, the timeline makes enough sense I think?
What you say about her body being in the vehicle when he dumped the laptop makes perfect sense but somehow makes it seem even more horrible. That witnesses to the laptop dumping had no idea at the time it was so sinister.