stormbird
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 659
- Reaction score
- 3,864
Thanks, Lemony. I had a listen and you're right. Hans Rupp: "I don't think any member of the family was involved at all."Not SA obviously but you can listen to Hans Rupp giving his opinion in Caroline Overington's Nowhere Child podcast - Episode 4 "Person Of Interest".
He did consider the foster parents could be involved however there was no evidence to support that , he went on to say he didn't think any member of the family was involved at all.
I transcribed a bit of what was said, edited to take out the ums and ahs:
From "A Person of Interest", Nowhere Child, episode 4, 09 August 2019
(the link goes to Omny.fm)
(08:33)
Caroline Overington (CO) to Hans Rupp: What was your feeling [about what might have happened to William]?
Hans Rupp (HR): Well, I think that there's some-- someone grabbed him, off the street, bundled him into a car and he just disappeared, and it's a very quiet street where he was living at the time, and it was so easy for the offender. It's a street that isn't a through road, so you had to have a reason to be in that street at that time. It's not like you'd find it accidentally or you just happen to be driving past, whoever did it had to be in that street at that time.
CO to listeners: Detective Rupp of course considered the possibility that the Fosters [the foster family] may have been involved. And again, there is no suggestion that they were, and they would in years to come be formally ruled out. But in those early days he had to consider it because, when somebody is murdered or suddenly goes missing, it is often the people closest to them who are responsible.
. . .
(09:57)
CO: In the Tyrrell case, he tested the story being told by the Fosters [the foster family] and it stood up for him. He saw trauma in their faces when they spoke about William, but what's most important is that he found no evidence to suggest that they were involved and he emphasised that to us repeatedly.
CO (to HR): You don't mean that in the case of-- like, the Tyrrell case would be absent from that idea that [re the offender in a homicide case] it's normally someone in the house who loves you. That's not your belief about that case.
HR: No, absolutely. That's generalising about how-- who commits murders. Now, the Tyrrell case was perplexing because there wasn't a clear suspect who had a connection to the family, and that's still the case today, I think.
CO: Yes, exactly, and your feeling was always that it was the stranger in that case and not - as a more traditional homicide - somebody that you know.
HR: Absolutely. There was a stranger involved. I don't think any member of the family was involved at all. No.