http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/kendall-in-agony-over-mystery-of-a-little-boy-lost-20140920-10jn4y.html
SEPTEMBER 21 2014
But every day since William went missing from his grandmother's backyard in Kendall on September 12, wearing his favourite Spider-Man suit, searchers have returned with the same answer: "Nil result".
In one of the most baffling missing persons cases he has seen, ..... said he has nothing, not even a hunch, to suggest what has happened to William.
However, Superintendent Fehon said there has not been a shred of evidence that William either wandered into the bush, was abducted by a stranger, or taken by someone known to him.
There is little, if any, through traffic, making the probability of a random, opportunistic attack "next to nil," Superintendent Fehon said.
Neighbours said they didn't hear or see any cars or strangers on Friday.
"That's the baffling part of this case," Superintendent Fehon said. "There is simply nothing."
"Tell me, what do you think has happened?" he asks, turning to a small group of reporters who all shrug. "We don't know either," he says.
The above are quotes from an article 21/09/2014, 9 days after WT's disappearance. We do know that a lot was going on behind the scenes in the investigation from day 1. Possibly as there was no real evidence to indicate what had happened to WT, all feasible eventualities have needed to be investigated, I am guessing. If what Fehon said to reporters on this date is true, then no strangers or strange cars were seen by neighbors that day. If his statement was not true, at what stage has the investigation team decided to withhold cars or strangers seen in the area and why. They may not have had evidence at that time to have thought about a particular line of inquiry however I have always had the sense (I know that is unreliable to go on), that the police from day one had a particular instinct as to who may have been responsible for WT's disappearance. And I think the reporters picked up on that instinct as well from the police. I can't recall a time I have seen police so open about their bafflement and bewilderment. In fact I remember thinking it was a veiled way of saying something else at the time. I've looked at a lot of angles on this case and I still can't shake a certain option. Maybe I read too much into things. What has changed for me though, is I do think he was in Kendall that morning and I do think he was the victim of a planned abduction, motive unknown.
The article below was published in April 2015. Parts of the article give information from this day that Fehon talked to a small group of reporters. I think it's strange that the only person who seems to have written up the above interview out of the small group of reporters is the journalist from SMH, as far as I can see.
Finally, trawling through articles from September 2014, the thing that stands out to me, was when, the FM went into the house to make a cup of tea. I'm a bit slow and I figure other members have pondered this point years ago.
Also, I don't trust that any family has been cleared although it has been reported widely, an example is Natalie Collins. GJ cleared all family in the below article in April 2015 and in the 60 minutes interview and yet we have seen in the media that Natalie has been looked at since then. It's interesting that NC has not been covered by the gag order, and the almost immediate reaction the Where's William campaign had when her opinion that WT was dead was published, saying "police believe William is alive." I have not seen police confirm that belief anywhere. Is it true that if police clear you on the public record in an investigation, that if you are charged later on you can say they were entrapped by the police?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sh-into-thin-air/story-e6frg6z6-1227308929078
All MOO of course.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/kendall-in-agony-over-mystery-of-a-little-boy-lost-20140920-10jn4y.html
SEPTEMBER 21 2014
But every day since William went missing from his grandmother's backyard in Kendall on September 12, wearing his favourite Spider-Man suit, searchers have returned with the same answer: "Nil result".
In one of the most baffling missing persons cases he has seen, ..... said he has nothing, not even a hunch, to suggest what has happened to William.
However, Superintendent Fehon said there has not been a shred of evidence that William either wandered into the bush, was abducted by a stranger, or taken by someone known to him.
There is little, if any, through traffic, making the probability of a random, opportunistic attack "next to nil," Superintendent Fehon said.
Neighbours said they didn't hear or see any cars or strangers on Friday.
"That's the baffling part of this case," Superintendent Fehon said. "There is simply nothing."
"Tell me, what do you think has happened?" he asks, turning to a small group of reporters who all shrug. "We don't know either," he says.
The above are quotes from an article 21/09/2014, 9 days after WT's disappearance. We do know that a lot was going on behind the scenes in the investigation from day 1. Possibly as there was no real evidence to indicate what had happened to WT, all feasible eventualities have needed to be investigated, I am guessing. If what Fehon said to reporters on this date is true, then no strangers or strange cars were seen by neighbors that day. If his statement was not true, at what stage has the investigation team decided to withhold cars or strangers seen in the area and why. They may not have had evidence at that time to have thought about a particular line of inquiry however I have always had the sense (I know that is unreliable to go on), that the police from day one had a particular instinct as to who may have been responsible for WT's disappearance. And I think the reporters picked up on that instinct as well from the police. I can't recall a time I have seen police so open about their bafflement and bewilderment. In fact I remember thinking it was a veiled way of saying something else at the time. I've looked at a lot of angles on this case and I still can't shake a certain option. Maybe I read too much into things. What has changed for me though, is I do think he was in Kendall that morning and I do think he was the victim of a planned abduction, motive unknown.
The article below was published in April 2015. Parts of the article give information from this day that Fehon talked to a small group of reporters. I think it's strange that the only person who seems to have written up the above interview out of the small group of reporters is the journalist from SMH, as far as I can see.
Finally, trawling through articles from September 2014, the thing that stands out to me, was when, the FM went into the house to make a cup of tea. I'm a bit slow and I figure other members have pondered this point years ago.
Also, I don't trust that any family has been cleared although it has been reported widely, an example is Natalie Collins. GJ cleared all family in the below article in April 2015 and in the 60 minutes interview and yet we have seen in the media that Natalie has been looked at since then. It's interesting that NC has not been covered by the gag order, and the almost immediate reaction the Where's William campaign had when her opinion that WT was dead was published, saying "police believe William is alive." I have not seen police confirm that belief anywhere. Is it true that if police clear you on the public record in an investigation, that if you are charged later on you can say they were entrapped by the police?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sh-into-thin-air/story-e6frg6z6-1227308929078
All MOO of course.
However, Superintendent Fehon said there has not been a shred of evidence that William either wandered into the bush, was abducted by a stranger, or taken by someone known to him.
Hello guys - I am new here so forgive me!
I have been looking at this case a lot lately for a university assignment. Because i am new i am sometimes finding searching threads difficult! & haven't been able to locate some stuff i am now wanting to ask.
1) it seems there was a 4wd that sped out of William's street at around 10.30am. It seems this car & it's occupant was seen in town prior to this. Just wondering if anyone has details of the 4wd and the POI wrt this? i can't find much info about it - but perhaps this is because the police are keeping the info low key?
2) the "jesus saves william tyrell" odd message on the tree stump. Is it possible that an offender would come back to the site - some time later - and leave a message? Kind of like a signature, or a perverted revisit to a scene near/or close to william? I have read this sign was left after the 'gamers' were there. I have seen several articles about the gamers stating it wasn't there until after the jar was placed under the stump. I wonder if the perp is coming back to the area and leaving behind some kind of signature? especially if he is "godly' or narcissistic & grandeur...
Please, if any of you can assist?
Thank you all, and i do apologise for my ignorance with thread searches!
iailwa
Hello guys - I am new here so forgive me!
I have been looking at this case a lot lately for a university assignment. Because i am new i am sometimes finding searching threads difficult! & haven't been able to locate some stuff i am now wanting to ask.
1) it seems there was a 4wd that sped out of William's street at around 10.30am. It seems this car & it's occupant was seen in town prior to this. Just wondering if anyone has details of the 4wd and the POI wrt this? i can't find much info about it - but perhaps this is because the police are keeping the info low key?
2) the "jesus saves william tyrell" odd message on the tree stump. Is it possible that an offender would come back to the site - some time later - and leave a message? Kind of like a signature, or a perverted revisit to a scene near/or close to william? I have read this sign was left after the 'gamers' were there. I have seen several articles about the gamers stating it wasn't there until after the jar was placed under the stump. I wonder if the perp is coming back to the area and leaving behind some kind of signature? especially if he is "godly' or narcissistic & grandeur...
Please, if any of you can assist?
Thank you all, and i do apologise for my ignorance with thread searches!
iailwa
Thanks @frogwell for your welcome. Yes i agree totally, more than one siting. I never did read anywhere that it was white, so that's interesting thanks. I can understand some freak might need to speed if he's snatched little william, yet be as calm as a cucumber leaving his street. I've also read there was a car that did a uturn in Benaroon Drive, earlier in the day - around 9am. I have read conflicting stuff as to what kind of vehicle, do you know if it was a grey SUV? When the other car is mentioned - the one seen leaving Benadoon drive around 10.30 and speeding later, they always refer to it as a 4WD. I wonder if most of the public know the difference, including me Clearance underneath? size? I'm female and not really into cars. cheers ~ iailwa
Wow? If the public had some more details about the 4WD that was speeding, and the guy in town, then maybe they'd have more leads. I read an earlier thread on here, that this 4wd was damaged, but can't find that info elsewhere on the net. Also, the sign about Jesus is totally weird. Makes me think they already know who did it, & so these things are triaged, or perhaps the previous POIs have been discontinued and they are hesitant to come forth with extra info about another perp until the next anniversary. Every time they come forth they get blastered for leaving it too long - feel sorry for the police & i hope they are covering more avenues than the 4 or 5 POIs. It's remarkable how hard it is to find rumours even on the net. They are def doing their job! I don't buy the jesus sign and their disappointment about it being related to william avenue. I think they were pretty happy bout it to be honest! speculation on my part...