Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #42

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
stormbird said:
It hasn't been said what type of car MFC drove that day, I think, but the foster family's vehicle was described in this article (near the end, just before the final photo):

"The foster couple looking after William had planned to drive up on September 12, a Friday, in their new green-grey coloured 2014 [4WD or SUV]." (I expect it's not okay to identify the thing here, except in general terms.)

- "William Tyrrell's birth family says they felt under suspicion for years", News.com.au, 14 April 2019
Click to expand...

Just going to rephrase my comments here ... I am very, very surprised that this article describes the FF vehicle.

I am sure that the Coroner has given instruction that no personal information about any of William's parents is allowed. Would have thought that info like this is personal and could be somewhat identifying to them, perhaps in conjunction with other info such as where and when the inquest is, for example - and that this kind of info could be walking a fine line.

Unless, of course, they have changed vehicles since then. Maybe that would be enough to get the info over that hurdle.
 
Last edited:
Bohemian said:
I think Candace has William’s FF confused with BS from another one of her pieces. The latter was supposedly at Laurieton on that fateful morning (or at least that’s his alibi):

‘A friend told Daily Mail Australia that Mr Spedding went to his Laurieton office on Bold St on the morning of September 12.’
William Spedding claims he had nothing to do with William Tyrell disappearance | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
I think it's naming the larger town (Laurieton) of which the smaller (Lakewood) is more or less a sub-district. There's a retirement village in Lakewood called Laurieton -- --. If I was far from home and asked where I lived, I'd name the city not the suburb. More people connect with what you're saying.
 
Latest search for William Tyrrell ends

"A line of inquiry into a ‘high risk’ person of interest led to another search location in the vicinity of Batar Creek Road and Cedar Loggers Lane, Batar Creek on June 27."

I remember when this last search commenced and the shift to that new location at Bartar Creek and Cedar Logins.
This new information came when they were searching last year around March however they confirmed inMSM (in other articles) that they had had this lead for some time at first. It was never confirmed whether it was a tip off from a local or another person that pushed them to this location or in regards to something they found in the bush. In the YOutube link attached DC Jubelin is very specific in pointing out the location they are searching, and really in a way like it is aiming at those involved to make them feel nervous. So why did they not start that search there first instead of the other area last year? Another tactic? I feel it was, an organise tactic to build a sense of they found something and are now moving in with new information, to unsettle those involved. This second link advises the search related to a High risk POI who lives nearby.
This person has never been named and I am not speculating although have my suspicians and will not name those here.


https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...arch-for-william-tyrrell-20180627-p4zo1h.html
 
JLZ said:
I think it's naming the larger town (Laurieton) of which the smaller (Lakewood) is more or less a sub-district. There's a retirement village in Lakewood called Laurieton -- --. If I was far from home and asked where I lived, I'd name the city not the suburb. More people connect with what you're saying.
Click to expand...
It may well be that Laurieton is the larger centre in reference to Lakewood, just as Port Macquarie is to Laurieton, but that does not negate the fact that the distance between the former is approximately 5 km and they are two distinct centres; geographically speaking (see map below).
043F5486-1538-4866-9727-3D903426B25F.jpeg
Source:
Google Maps
 
Last edited:
Bohemian said:
It may well be that Laurieton is the larger centre in reference to Lakewood, just as Port Macquarie is to Laurieton, but that does not negate the fact that the distance between the former is approximately 5 km and they are two distinct centres; geographically speaking (see map below).
View attachment 192451
Source:
Google Maps
Click to expand...
I don't disagree and I can't say much more about it without criticizing a journalist.
 
Bohemian said:
It may well be that Laurieton is the larger centre in reference to Lakewood, just as Port Macquarie is to Laurieton, but that does not negate the fact that the distance between the former is approximately 5 km and they are two distinct centres; geographically speaking (see map below).
View attachment 192451
Source:
Google Maps
Click to expand...

This is correct. Laurieton is the bigger of the two. It is a real retiree area as well as houses a few holiday accomodation as well as Dunbogan. Lakewood is similar to what I would describe a suburb with what would have been new housing estates many years ago and where you would find mainly owner occupied or long term rental properties aposed to holiday accomodation. I am talking from 10 years ago being in that area.
 
mussopossum said:
This is correct. Laurieton is the bigger of the two. It is a real retiree area as well as houses a few holiday accomodation as well as Dunbogan. Lakewood is similar to what I would describe a suburb with what would have been new housing estates many years ago and where you would find mainly owner occupied or long term rental properties aposed to holiday accomodation. I am talking from 10 years ago being in that area.
Click to expand...
Thanks poss. The reason for making the distinction between the two centres is that AFAIK William’s FF was at Lakewood attending his GoToMeeting on the morning of September 12, 2014, whilst BS was said to be at his office, having coffee with MS and attending a school presentation at Laurieton, approximately five kilometres away, that very same morning.

I think it’s important for the above to be recognised, lest rumours start about William’s FF and BS being at the same location and possibly meeting up. Inaccuracies in MSM often become quasi fact and lead to the formation of wild conspiracy theories if left unchallenged.
 
Last edited:
Bohemian said:
Thanks poss. The reason for making the distinction between the two centres is that AFAIK William’s FF was at Lakewood attending his GoToMeeting on the morning of September 12, 2014, whilst BS was said to be at his office, having coffee with MS and attending a school presentation at Laurieton, approximately five kilometres away, that very same morning.

I think it’s important for the above to be recognised, lest rumours start about William’s FF and BS being at the same location and possibly meeting up. Inaccuracies in MSM often become quasi fact and lead to the formation of wild conspiracy theories if left unchallenged.
Click to expand...
if someone was driving left out of Beneroon Drive that morning would MFC possibly passed in the opposite direction at all maybe..i have never been to the area
 
Ms Cadfael said:
How awesome would it have been if he had a dash cam! May have just captured the perp.
Click to expand...
Maybe he did (have a dash cam) and maybe he didn’t (film William’s abductor). It was all dependent on the timing and which way the abductor went and by what means. If William’s abductor was someone who lived close to his FGM’s house they might not have used a car, or if they turned right on Batar Creek Road, toward the second search site, William’s FF may not have crossed paths with them at all.
 
Just a thought...

"IF" William is found to be deceased by the coroner, would his birth family be entitled to compensation?

They must be so wanting someone/something to be found responsible for his removal, then losing him a second time.
I certainly would.
All MOO.
 
Where's William Tyrrell? EP 3: One Last Roar

Episode three of 10 News First’s Where’s William Tyrrell? podcast has revealed responding officers did not seal off the yard where William was last seen playing on September 12, 2014, instead allowing dozens of people through the area, potentially contaminating any forensic evidence.

William’s foster mother, who cannot be identified for legal reasons said she fears any trace her foster son’s abductor may have left behind has been lost.

“It does concern us because there may have been evidence, there may have been something that pushed police in an entirely different direction,” she said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 51 more.
Total: 3,102 (members: 52, guests: 3,050)

Online statistics

Members online
52
Guests online
3,050
Total visitors
3,102
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
602,663
Messages
18,144,703
Members
231,476
Latest member
ceciliaesquivel2000@yahoo
Back
Top