I think the comment being replied to, was not in regard to any one topic in particular in MSM (such as the search of the S property), but rather it was in regard to a LARGE number of subject details published in MSM. For example.. the location where the family was sitting prior to WT's disappearance.. it has been reported as being from SO many areas, such as front, side, backyard, balcony, and even the driveway. How is this possible that there are so many different stories if this is not made up and perhaps embellished by at least some MSM as they go along? Surely the reporters are not receiving these reports from actual sources who know the correct answer? Unless of course, the sources are changing their stories depending on which media they may be speaking to, which I highly doubt and would be unthinkable.
The age of WT's sibling, the 21 houses searched (this was reported as happening both during the original search, and during the time when the S property wsas being searched), was dad called before or after police were called, what made LE decide to converge upon the S property, was it a CS tip as originally reported numerous times, or was it discrepancies in his story, which seemed to be reported after the friend Colin mentioned something to that effect? Which statement is true? There was an appliance repair van reported seen on the street days after the disappearance, and later, after Mr. S's property was searched, that repair van story became that it was Mr. S's repair van that was seen. Is this a fact? Only one reporter reported seeing that repair van amongst all of the LE vehicles, but she did not report specifically the name of the company.. then later, all of the other reporters who didn't even see the van to begin with, reported it as being Mr. S's. Does that make sense? Is that embellishment? There are piles and piles and piles of discrepancies in the reporting of details in this case.
With some detail discrepancies, some may want to toss them aside saying they are irrelevant, but I disagree with that. For example.. the sibling's age.. at age 4 perhaps it may be less likely that she could verbalize what she saw and remembers exactly, whereas if she was 6 or 5 or 8, not so much. If Mr. S was searched due to a CS tip, it, in my humble opinion, would carry a different weight than if he reported discrepancies in his story to LE. All of the reported discrepancies in media lead one to wonder if we can believe anything at all that is reported. MOO
