Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #52

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it just me or does anyone else feel like every time the press or police or ...hone in on a particular person, everybody starts to question n cross examine their thoughts and ideas and then POOF out they come with another story that makes you question n cross examine yourself and then POOF over n over again.. is this intentional for behind the scene purposes or does nobody who represents this case actually have any idea what they’re doing or who they’re looking for??????t
gaeilge said:
Criminologist explains what police are looking for in fresh search. Video at link.

Sunrise
@sunriseon7
·
8h
Sunrise on Twitter

Police investigating the disappearance of William Tyrrell have returned to a property on the New South Wales Mid North Coast to conduct a fresh search. Criminologist Dr
@XantheMallett
explains what police are looking for. More on this story: https://7news.link/37HvSAa
Click to expand...
thanks
I’ll take that as “they have no idea”....
 
Christ74 said:
Is it just me or does anyone else feel like every time the press or police or ...hone in on a particular person, everybody starts to question n cross examine their thoughts and ideas and then POOF out they come with another story that makes you question n cross examine yourself and then POOF over n over again.. is this intentional for behind the scene purposes or does nobody who represents this case actually have any idea what they’re doing or who they’re looking for??????
Click to expand...
YES !
 
gaeilge said:
Criminologist explains what police are looking for in fresh search. Video at link.

Sunrise
@sunriseon7
·
8h
Sunrise on Twitter

Police investigating the disappearance of William Tyrrell have returned to a property on the New South Wales Mid North Coast to conduct a fresh search. Criminologist Dr
@XantheMallett
explains what police are looking for. More on this story: https://7news.link/37HvSAa
Click to expand...
Hmm, the criminologist says one reason for searching property again, someone might have returned?
 
I wish we could get confirmation from the police themselves that it was 316 they were searching and not the other Logans Crossing site where FA lived near . . . and I forget his name, GO?
 
Going back a little, some people brought up a theory that the perpetrator had suicided. I think someone posted about another case as an example and someone else said yes. Did either of you have a particular Kendall-area suicide in mind? Not asking for a name, just yes/no.
 
PrimeSuspect said:
Hmm, the criminologist says one reason for searching property again, someone might have returned?[/QUOT
the only message I got from that was that it could take yrs to resolve and they are hopeful.. other than that I honestly believe they have anything solid whatsoever.. how devastating... they are throwing it up and out there praying for the smallest sign.. I’ll just keep on praying
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Re visiting the tree with wt name n message found by a random local who just so happened to be driving through that part of middle brother forest.. Kendall well known for its blackbutt trees and bird watching.. really when you think about it almost anybody could have been there on that morning wt disappeared local or foreign to the community n for a number of different reasons... like Craddock said “it’s likely that this is one of those cases that was so random that it’s almost impossible to point the finger accurately at only one person.. I feel like this case needs fresh eyes and fresh start
 
Christ74 said:
Re visiting the tree with wt name n message found by a random local who just so happened to be driving through that part of middle brother forest.. Kendall well known for its blackbutt trees and bird watching.. really when you think about it almost anybody could have been there on that morning wt disappeared local or foreign to the community n for a number of different reasons... like Craddock said “it’s likely that this is one of those cases that was so random that it’s almost impossible to point the finger accurately at only one person.. I feel like this case needs fresh eyes and fresh start
Click to expand...
Or it’s the most blindingly obvious.
 
Christ74 said:
Cool.. what’s the go with the trinkets though? Does the excitement come from the find or from the treasure itself?
Click to expand...

depends what the rules are for each one, some let you take one as a reward, you can also leave something for others to find at the same location, could be a message or a group photo maybe a small trinket, even a website or twitter account to see other people who went there, sometimes you have to report back what the item is that was there at the time as proof you went there, some owners of the caches change them weekly to keep it exciting, we went to one where the cache creator left homemade boomarks to take if you found the cache so it really depends, others it was just an item to find and take a photo of/with and rehide it for others to find

there is a geocache website you might be able to check if indeed there was an old cache there at some point and what the rules or clues were see if the WT was apart of it
 
Last edited:
PingTheRouter said:
depends what the rules are for each one, some let you take one as a reward, you can also leave something for others to find at the same location, could be a message or a group photo maybe a small trinket, even a website or twitter account to see other people who went there, sometimes you have to report back what the item is that was there at the time as proof you went there, some owners of the caches change them weekly to keep it exciting, we went to one where the cache creator left homemade boomarks to take if you found the cache so it really depends, others it was just an item to find and take a photo of/with and rehide it for others to find

there is a geocache website you might be able to check if indeed there was an old cache there at some point and what the rules or clues were see if the WT was apart of it
Click to expand...
That’s brilliant thanks and happy Geocaching
 
Tinker Taylor said:
I'm just trying to put the pieces together.

1. William didn't leave the driveway (according to the tracker dogs) and I don't believe he had any shoes on, so he was probably picked up in a vehicle.
2. Whoever took him probably had business in the street and if seen would not have been regarded as suspicious.
3. Postie and FGM were friends.
4. Crabbs heard a vehicle that they thought was the postie.
5. PS was supposedly outside waiting for the postie.o
6. Ron Chapman saw a woman with blonde hair piled on her head with a child in a spider man suit he believes was William, speeding past his street.

If I was an investigator, I'd be having a closer look.

Am I crazy??
Click to expand...
Many Thanks TT - I found your dot points most helpful / certainly grounding ..

I’m always way behind - but still sharing thoughts for William. Please God for answers.

In relation to the search once again of Caravan area - apparently 10 minutes from FG as reported today (wonder is that by foot or car ?)

And my brain tweaks at mentions of ‘caravans’.

so much sadness. Time for ‘better’ IMO, and I am trying to work it out ....it’s just reminiscent of Rome ! ! .

Was ‘lyn’ perhaps anywhere in the Vicinity ?
Could she’ve known something - even unwittingly or unknowingly ?

IMO - certainly I’d be interested to hear of ‘Lyn’s’ knowledge/ stories she’s heard... if there when or post FA inhabiting that Van.
 
I would like to ask: What is with this property and it's owner, which was mentioned during the search at Batar Creek Road and Cedars Loggers. The property was an adjacent neighbor's land and the owner wasn't named, but SFR/reporters (?) had an interest in him.
Do we now know, whose property it is and why it was/is important?
 
FromGermany said:
I would like to ask: What is with this property and it's owner, which was mentioned during the search at Batar Creek Road and Cedars Loggers. The property was an adjacent neighbor's land and the owner wasn't named, but SFR/reporters (?) had an interest in him.
Do we now know, whose property it is and why it was/is important?
Click to expand...

I thought - just maybe - this was around the time they were tracking PS?? Perhaps he stopped there to make a call for a couple of mins or something else? They only searched a very small area... someone must have stopped not for too long? Just a wild guess tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 180 more.
Total: 697 (members: 181, guests: 516)

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
516
Total visitors
697
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,326
Messages
18,237,754
Members
234,342
Latest member
wendysuzette
Back
Top