Yes I was addressing your post.
It seems what was said was said in open court, with FA listening, I imagine he is aware. I'm sure that Doc wasn't the only person in the room either.
Their privacy, as far as the court is concerned, is that they have been given pseudonyms and have not been identified, ensuring their safety and privacy. We don't know their situation, they could live on the other side of Australia at this point or even overseas. We don't know.
For the Journalists to be able to actually put a name to the person they were discussing, is obviously a choice/decision made by the court - how else would they know if they children where using pseudonyms? The women giving testimony, even with pseudonyms, were visible to FA.
All we know is what was said in Open Court, which Doc has so generously relayed to us.
And BTW, it's against TOS to tell posters how to and what they should post.
ETA: Doc is not the first person I have heard this from. So how do you propose to stop the truth?