I do think LE have something more concrete than what's been revealed in the media. I get the feeling that the FF would sue if LE had no good reason for all of this.I'm thinking that when they announced in September of this year, that there was a new 'person of interest', the FF were well aware it was them, hence their reaction to it. I'm figuring the police announced that to get them talking amongst themselves and had them bugged at the same time. The AVO could have resulted from that 'bugging' IMO
The link didn't work for me the first time and still doesn't.
I get a a "G" icon on a black page https://static.guim.co.uk/images/favicon-32x32.ico That's the address that shows.
My theory is that the FD still believed WT had been abducted and wanted to keep him in the spotlight. I guess we'll find out soon.If the FPs are guilty,why would they keep pushing for the case to be solved?
Would be so much easier to just let things fade away.
If the FPs are guilty,why would they keep pushing for the case to be solved?
Would be so much easier to just let things fade away.
The link didn't work for me the first time and still doesn't.
I get a a "G" icon on a black page https://static.guim.co.uk/images/favicon-32x32.ico That's the address that shows.
Is there any possibility there has already been an arrest and that is why current information emanating from NSW Police which indicates they are certain they have a one and only 'suspect'?
Edit: what makes me consider this scenario is it is very unusual IMO that there has been no public display of backlash from the person we knew as the female foster carer.
Oh sorry. Not sure what the issue is, I’m not very tech savvy. If Boomburgers link below mine works for you, that is the same article I’m having trouble with.
I can't make sense of it either. A balcony fall or hit by the family car, why cover it up? As we know, sadly, they're are all too common accidents around the family home.
I thought at the time, the FM may have felt guilty about leaving WT alone and it was longer than she claimed or remembered, but this new theory?! I'm surprised and shocked, if it's true, I hope they fess up, this charade can't go on!
Whatever is uncovered, let's hope this is the year WT is found.
Yes that is about the only thing that makes sense.My theory is that the FD still believed WT had been abducted and wanted to keep him in the spotlight. I guess we'll find out soon.
Gary Jubelin is often lauded around these parts, but it certainly sounds like he didn't follow a methodical process but rather was a bit scattergun in his approach.
The Foster family's involvement, especially if he has passed away on the property, would be absolutely dreadful for a number of reasons not least of all being what it would mean for the effectiveness of the initial police investigation. How could that have been kept from his older sister though?
this case just got curiouser and curiouser.
It's news to me that he disappeared from the balcony.
I always thought he was outside on the lawn.
It's totally baffling. These things were missed in both the initial investigation and when Jubelin took over. Why were the FF seemingly untouchable? I just don't get it. I don't want criticise LE but Detective Chief Inspector Laidlaw had some strong comments:
Commissioner Fuller said the current team of investigators, led by Detective Chief Inspector David Laidlaw, inherited a "bit of a mess" but have "really cleaned up the investigation".
He said time had been wasted in the past and some people had needlessly come under suspicion.
Police close in on new person of interest in William Tyrrell disappearance as fresh searches continue