SleepyJoe
Verified - Medical Specialist (Anaesthetist)
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2021
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 2,496
When I make the roar sound my eyes automaticallly look up. Imo, this is much ado about nothing.
But, IMO, it does raise a question about the honesty of her account. She specifically says that he was looking at her (and then goes on to unnecessarily explain why) and he clearly wasn't looking at her at all. Hence, this is an untruth, which by definition is a 'lie'. That there gives one example where she is not being honest and gives us a reason to question why she was not being honest and what else she has not been honest about. IF WT was looking at someone else, it also poses doubt about her account of the circumstances of when the photos were taken. This is compounded by the discrepancies about the time she says they were taken and the "created times" revealed at the inquest. As someone else has said, camera times are often not set to the local time and are totally out. But yet the FFC has said they were taken at 9:37am, which is the "corrected time", not "created time".
All of this raises legitimate questions about her version of events and her credibility. It's not about the photos per se, it's about her honesty.