AZL:
Wouldn't the motion(s) you mention come into play when specific documents/pieces of evidence are requested by the media/public, and access is subsequently denied? In other words, would the media/public need to
know about the existence of certain documents in order for said info to be part of a document request? Overly simple example: (i) Say the prosecution requested soil tests on the Anthony's house plants, and (ii) the public's unaware of those soil tests. I don't think the SA's office is required to itemize all every document they have, as a way to facilitate a request for each and every piece of information*. So how would information about those tests either make it into the public realm, or alternatively become the subject of a motion/hearing?
*disclaimer: I've not yet read all of
Florida's Sunshine Law, but I have it bookmarked. I'm hoping you can give a quick and easy answer. TIA!