Sherbert
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 528
- Reaction score
- 0
I almost hate to say this because I believe that Oscar is guilty of murder, so it's all an intellectual exercise to me. But as I understand it, Culpable Homicide isn't dolus eventualis lite.
Judge Masipa, rightly or wrongly accepted Oscar's version, so a verdict of putative self defence. But as Oscar used excess force, and a reasonable man would have chosen a defence which didn't lead to the putative intruder's demise, it's culpable homicide. So there isn't intention to kill UNLAWFULLY and dolus eventualis is knowing that an unlawful death is likely or possible from your action and carrying it out regardless. Sometimes I 'get' this, sometimes I don't, like one of those optical illusion ambiguous drawings.
BBM
Yes, that's exactly how it is. And, to make matters even more confusing, I have seen judgements containing a simultaneous finding of intent and culpable homicide!