Baez Files 8 Motions In Case

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I know that it is difficult fodder to digest while following the absurdities in this case but JB is doing his job as well as any criminal attorney can be expected to do. Here is a link that is very interesting reading about the task of a criminal defense attorney and the fact that he (or she) is defending the integrity of democracy and the justice system.

Don't be mean to me :blowkiss:

It's just interesting to try to get past the indignities and respect JB for the job (TERRIBLE job in my opinion) he has to do. The only thing he would eventually have yet to do is in some way be removed from the case if his personal morals precluded him from giving his client a fair trial.

http://www.ethicsscoreboard.com/list/defense.html

No flame -- just some clarification:

I haven't read every post, so maybe some are complaining that Casey has a lawyer. Many, including me understand that defense lawyers have a job that is necessary for all. If the evidence isn't tested every time, etc. Slippery slope that is so treacherous, without constant vigilance, when it's the turn of one of us or one of our loved ones, perhaps actual evidence won't be necessary to convict, just the opinion of the investigating officer. Totally understand that.

However, it doesn't take a lot to think up, 'keep your mouth shut' and so far, that's one of the few things he's done well, imo. This is why some, including me, believe that JB's representation thus far is at best 'clownish' and at worst, detrimental to the very system we all want protected, as well as his client. One example is in my sig line. :)
 
Couldn't the charges for neglect be upgraded to homicide charges even tho the trial date for neglect is already set?

*** Never mind!.....Just read your post, Seranade!
 
How does the state prove Casey has "lost" Caylee? Can it order her to produce the child?

I was searching for the legal definition of 'neglect' in the Florida statutes and came across this site that says:

Neglect
Neglect is frequently defined in terms of deprivation of adequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, or supervision.

The state has to prove that Casey is neglectful. Casey has to prove nothing.

If the state cannot compel Casey to produce her daughter (and maybe it can, I don't know), how does the prosecutor prove she's a victim of neglect?

They can't force her to produce Caylee or documentation of her well-being but they can jail her if she doesn't.

Casey has stated under oath that she had no idea of her daughter's whereabouts for 31 days and did not notify LE. Those statements she gave LE were sworn. IMO, case(y) closed.
 
Thanks, Lin! I like the idea of her being in jail since we know she can't or won't do either one of those things. :)
 
They would elevate the charges and reset the date.
But if the GJ isn't finished with its investigation by the time the Neglect hearing comes up...they can't elevate the charges yet. So in that case...can they ask to reset the date anyway?
 
I can't find it but he just lost a major case here in central Florida, it was a murder case as well I believe? perhaps Child Abuse? I can't find it atm.

State case, not federal, as far as I know. Generally, appellate counsel will be different than criminal counsel. Wouldn't find the local case unless it's appealed and a decision rendered, (usually has to be published too), except in the local clerk's office and then you'd need info in advance to find it.
 
"Your honor, for the safety and well-being of her child, my client has placed her in the care of [insert made-up person here], to protect her from discord in the family home and my client's current inability to provide financially for her needs."

I sure hope the state can require Miss Casey to prove whatever ridiculous statement Baez is planning to make, unless of course by the time the court date comes around she's been charged with murder.

Doubtful he'd try that one; think about all the man hours and money expended already. And her word won't be accepted by the court. No way. No how. In her wildest fantasies, court would adjourn pending subpoena to _______ to immediately appear. But in reality, more likely to slap contempt on JB for insulting the court, offering that statement with no proof.
 
But if the GJ isn't finished with its investigation by the time the Neglect hearing comes up...they can't elevate the charges yet. So in that case...can they ask to reset the date anyway?

My guess would be that they would ask for a postponement if the GJ isn't finished.
 
Does KC have to answer questions from Judge in this hearing? Directly? I would imagine so, but I don't know.

Casey won't be on the stand, in all likelihood. Doors are way too easily opened that way. Even saying she wants to search would open door for prosecution to ask where and why; to present rebuttal evidence, etc. She can plead 5th on any questions put to her not on the stand or not opened by her direct exam, not that the court is likely to question her.
 
sorry if this is repetitive but it bothers me how can they still cling to proven lies
Casey chose to be very specific in her lies to say a specific person kidnapped her daughter, not a stranger came by and grabbed her, rather a specific person, who she has supposedly known for a while.
So she should be required to prove that this person at least exists.
No one in her family or friends ever met ZG????
the one person, Jeff, that she says introduced them, Jeff denies and by the way does not even have any kids as Casey stated.
Ok, what about at Sawgrass, any proof the ZG lived in the apartment that Casey stated she has been to, no proof.
how about neighbors?, surely there would be neighbors that can confirm they knew ZG, that she lived there right, wrong.
its ridiculous
 
It is ridiculous, but since it is Casey's initial testimony...they have to stick with some form of her story for her defense. Gotta stay the course.
 
btw, not seeing how they'd get results of poly because there's no court that allows it to be admitted. Statements, yes, poly report? Doubt it.
 
sorry if this is repetitive but it bothers me how can they still cling to proven lies
Casey chose to be very specific in her lies to say a specific person kidnapped her daughter, not a stranger came by and grabbed her, rather a specific person, who she has supposedly known for a while.
So she should be required to prove that this person at least exists.
No one in her family or friends ever met ZG????
the one person, Jeff, that she says introduced them, Jeff denies and by the way does not even have any kids as Casey stated.
Ok, what about at Sawgrass, any proof the ZG lived in the apartment that Casey stated she has been to, no proof.
how about neighbors?, surely there would be neighbors that can confirm they knew ZG, that she lived there right, wrong.
its ridiculous

1. IMO, further proof of neglect, having no real idea of who sitter allegedly is;

2. She can state or have stated on her behalf that sitter did it but then the state can enter evidence that the person doesn't exist and it's up to her defense whether or not they want to try to rebut the state's evidence.

3. If they don't rebut, it's a credibility issue; everyone else against Casey or someone speaking obo of Casey. Who do you think is gonna win that one? :)
 
VI. DISCOVERY
RULE 3.220. DISCOVERY

(a) Notice of Discovery.
After the filing of the charging document, a defendant may elect to participate in the

discovery process provided by these rules, including the taking of discovery depositions, by filing with the court and

serving on the prosecuting attorney a “Notice of Discovery” which shall bind both the prosecution and defendant to
all discovery procedures contained in these rules. Participation by a defendant in the discovery process, including the
taking of any deposition by a defendant or the filing of a public records request under chapter 119, Florida Statutes,
for law enforcement records relating to the defendant’s pending prosecution, which are nonexempt as a result of a
codefendant’s participation in discovery, shall be an election to participate in discovery and triggers a reciprocal
discovery obligation for the defendant. If any defendant knowingly or purposely shares in discovery obtained by a
codefendant, the defendant shall be deemed to have elected to participate in discovery.
 
(b) Prosecutor’s Discovery Obligation.​
(1) Within 15 days after service of the Notice of Discovery, the prosecutor shall serve a written Discovery
Exhibit which shall disclose to the defendant and permit the defendant to inspect, copy, test, and photograph the
following information and material within the state’s possession or control:
(A) a list of the names and addresses of all persons known to the prosecutor to have information that may be
relevant to any offense charged or any defense thereto, or to any similar fact evidence to be presented at trial under
section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses of persons listed shall be clearly designated in the
following categories:
(i) Category A. These witnesses shall include (1) eye witnesses, (2) alibi witnesses and rebuttal to alibi
witnesses, (3) witnesses who were present when a recorded or unrecorded statement was taken from or made by a
defendant or codefendant, which shall be separately identified within this category, (4) investigating officers, (5)
witnesses known by the prosecutor to have any material information that tends to negate the guilt of the defendant as
to any offense charged, (6) child hearsay witnesses, and (7) expert witnesses who have not provided a written report
and a curriculum vitae or who are going to testify to test results or give opinions that will have to meet the test set
forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
(ii) Category B. All witnesses not listed in either Category A or Category C.
(iii) Category C. All witnesses who performed only ministerial functions or whom the prosecutor does not
intend to call at trial and whose involvement with and knowledge of the case is fully set out in a police report or
other statement furnished to the defense;
(B) the statement of any person whose name is furnished in compliance with the preceding subdivision. The
term “statement” as used herein includes a written statement made by the person and signed or otherwise adopted or
approved by the person and also includes any statement of any kind or manner made by the person and written or recorded
or summarized in any writing or recording. The term “statement” is specifically intended to include all police
and investigative reports of any kind prepared for or in connection with the case, but shall not include the notes from
which those reports are compiled;
(C) any written or recorded statements and the substance of any oral statements made by the defendant,
including a copy of any statements contained in police reports or report summaries, together with the name and
address of each witness to the statements;
(D) any written or recorded statements and the substance of any oral statements made by a codefendant if
the trial is to be a joint one;
(E) those portions of recorded grand jury minutes that contain testimony of the defendant;
(F) any tangible papers or objects that were obtained from or belonged to the defendant;
(G) whether the state has any material or information that has been provided by a confidential informant;
(H) whether there has been any electronic surveillance, including wiretapping, of the premises of the
defendant or of conversations to which the defendant was a party and any documents relating thereto;
(I) whether there has been any search or seizure and any documents relating thereto;
(J) reports or statements of experts made in connection with the particular case, including results of
physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons; and
(K) any tangible papers or objects that the prosecuting attorney intends to use in the hearing or trial and that
were not obtained from or that did not belong to the defendant.
(2) If the court determines, in camera, that any police or investigative report contains irrelevant, sensitive
information or information interrelated with other crimes or criminal activities and the disclosure of the contents of
the police report may seriously impair law enforcement or jeopardize the investigation of those other crimes or
activities, the court may prohibit or partially restrict the disclosure.
(3) The court may prohibit the state from introducing into evidence any of the foregoing material not disclosed,
so as to secure and maintain fairness in the just determination of the cause.
(4) As soon as practicable after the filing of the charging document the prosecutor shall disclose to the defendant
any material information within the state’s possession or control that tends to negate the guilt of the defendant as to any
offense charged, regardless of whether the defendant has incurred reciprocal discovery obligations.​
 
(c) Disclosure to Prosecution.​
(1) After the filing of the charging document and subject to constitutional limitations, the court may require a
defendant to:
(A) appear in a lineup;
(B) speak for identification by witnesses to an offense;
(C) be fingerprinted;
(D) pose for photographs not involving re-enactment of a scene;
(E) try on articles of clothing;
(F) permit the taking of specimens of material under the defendant’s fingernails;
(G) permit the taking of samples of the defendant’s blood, hair, and other materials of the defendant’s body
that involves no unreasonable intrusion thereof;
(H) provide specimens of the defendant’s handwriting; and
(I) submit to a reasonable physical or medical inspection of the defendant’s body.
(2) If the personal appearance of a defendant is required for the foregoing purposes, reasonable notice of the
time and location of the appearance shall be given by the prosecuting attorney to the defendant and his or her
counsel. Provisions may be made for appearances for such purposes in an order admitting a defendant to bail or
providing for pretrial release.​
 
See, I think this depends on the evidence put forward in the Neglect case. If they are going to proceed, the DA has to be so careful what they use, but I believe they can get a "guilty" on neglect, without introducing the possible death issue. Done carefully, they can use the 31 days not reporting, blah, blah, blah, and that LE does not know where Caylee is, and KC did not cooperate, even when CA reported. Does that make sense? (First cup of coffee for the day). That's the discovery that JB is entitled to at this point, IMO.

** edited to add, I finally read the latest motions, and I still think JB is gearing up to cause double jeopardy, by attempting to force murder investigation evidence into the Neglect trial. JMHO.

This is how I see it as well. Child neglect charges are divided into classes so to speak. Anywhere from death resulting from the neglect to no physical harm has come to the child. Casey is charged with the one that states no physical harm has come to Caylee as a result of the neglect. You can see this in the charging affidavit and look it up in the Florida statutes. I would imagine the current charges relate to not reporting that she doesn't know where she is for 31 days. They don't know that harm has come to Caylee so they haven't charged her with that class of neglect. Nonetheless, she is guilty of neglect because she did not report that she doesn't know where she is.

If, somewhere down the line, evidence is uncovered that reveals Casey may have murdered Caylee, they should be able to charge her with it without risking DJ because the charges are unrelated. I agree this is why Baez wants the forensic evidence...to force the DJ issue. As it stands, I don't think it is an issue. This is how I interpret it...I may be wrong.

On another note, in reading on the web about issues surrounding this trial, charges etc., I found it interesting that if Casey had taken the use immunity offered to her, she would have been compelled to testify as to the whereabouts of Caylee. Use immunity would have prevented her from using her fifth amendment rights because nothing she said could be used against her anyway. If she failed to answer the question of Caylee's whereabouts, she would be held in contempt of court until she did.
 
I have a question concerning Baez I have heard he’s only been practicing a short time but does anyone know what his win/lose has been on other cases.
 
(d) Defendant’s Obligation.

(1) If a defendant elects to participate in discovery, either through filing the appropriate notice or by
participating in any discovery process, including the taking of a discovery deposition, the following disclosures shall
be made:
(A) Within 15 days after receipt by the defendant of the Discovery Exhibit furnished by the prosecutor
pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(A) of this rule, the defendant shall furnish to the prosecutor a written list of the names
and addresses of all witnesses whom the defendant expects to call as witnesses at the trial or hearing. When the
prosecutor subpoenas a witness whose name has been furnished by the defendant, except for trial subpoenas, the
rules applicable to the taking of depositions shall apply.
(B) Within 15 days after receipt of the prosecutor’s Discovery Exhibit the defendant shall serve a written
Discovery Exhibit which shall disclose to and permit the prosecutor to inspect, copy, test, and photograph the
following information and material that is in the defendant’s possession or control:
(i) the statement of any person listed in subdivision (d)(1)(A), other than that of the defendant;
(ii) reports or statements of experts made in connection with the particular case, including results of
physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons; and
(iii) any tangible papers or objects that the defendant intends to use in the hearing or trial.
(2) The prosecutor and the defendant shall perform their obligations under this rule in a manner mutually
agreeable or as ordered by the court.
(3) The filing of a motion for protective order by the prosecutor will automatically stay the times provided for in
this subdivision. If a protective order is granted, the defendant may, within 2 days thereafter, or at any time before
the prosecutor furnishes the information or material that is the subject of the motion for protective order, withdraw
the defendant’s notice of discovery and not be required to furnish reciprocal discovery.​
 
(e) Restricting Disclosure. The court on its own initiative or on motion of counsel shall deny or partially restrict
disclosures authorized by this rule if it finds there is a substantial risk to any person of physical harm, intimidation,
bribery, economic reprisals, or unnecessary annoyance or embarrassment resulting from the disclosure, that
outweighs any usefulness of the disclosure to either party.

(f) Additional Discovery.​
On a showing of materiality, the court may require such other discovery to the parties
as justice may require.

(g) Matters Not Subject to Disclosure.
(1) Work Product.​
Disclosure shall not be required of legal research or of records, correspondence, reports, or
memoranda to the extent that they contain the opinions, theories, or conclusions of the prosecuting or defense
attorney or members of their legal staffs.

(2) Informants.​
Disclosure of a confidential informant shall not be required unless the confidential informant is to
be produced at a hearing or trial or a failure to disclose the informant’s identity will infringe the constitutional rights of
the defendant.

(h) Discovery Depositions.
(1) Generally.​
At any time after the filing of the charging document any party may take the deposition upon
oral examination of any person authorized by this rule. A party taking a deposition shall give reasonable written
notice to each other party and shall make a good faith effort to coordinate the date, time, and location of the
deposition to accommodate the schedules of other parties and the witness to be deposed. The notice shall state the
time and the location where the deposition is to be taken, the name of each person to be examined, and a certificate
of counsel that a good faith effort was made to coordinate the deposition schedule. After notice to the parties the
court may, for good cause shown, extend or shorten the time and may change the location of the deposition. Except
as provided herein, the procedure for taking the deposition, including the scope of the examination, and the issuance
of a subpoena (except a subpoena duces tecum) for deposition by an attorney of record in the action, shall be the
same as that provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Any deposition taken pursuant to this rule may be
used by any party for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching the testimony of the deponent as a witness. The
trial court or the clerk of the court may, upon application, issue subpoenas for the persons whose depositions are to
be taken. In any case, including multiple defendants or consolidated cases, no person shall be deposed more than
once except by consent of the parties or by order of the court issued on good cause shown. A witness who refuses to
obey a duly served subpoena may be adjudged in contempt of the court from which the subpoena issued.
(A) The defendant may, without leave of court, take the deposition of any witness listed by the prosecutor as a
Category A witness or listed by a co-defendant as a witness to be called at a joint trial or hearing. After receipt by
the defendant of the Discovery Exhibit, the defendant may, without leave of court, take the deposition of any
unlisted witness who may have information relevant to the offense charged. The prosecutor may, without leave of
court, take the deposition of any witness listed by the defendant to be called at a trial or hearing.
(B) No party may take the deposition of a witness listed by the prosecutor as a Category B witness except upon
leave of court with good cause shown. In determining whether to allow a deposition, the court should consider the
consequences to the defendant, the complexities of the issues involved, the complexity of the testimony of the witness
(e.g., experts), and the other opportunities available to the defendant to discover the information sought by deposition.
(C) A witness listed by the prosecutor as a Category C witness shall not be subject to deposition unless the
court determines that the witness should be listed in another category.
(D) No deposition shall be taken in a case in which the defendant is charged only with a misdemeanor or a
criminal traffic offense when all other discovery provided by this rule has been complied with unless good cause can
be shown to the trial court. In determining whether to allow a deposition, the court should consider the consequences
to the defendant, the complexity of the issues involved, the complexity of the witness’ testimony (e.g., experts), and
the other opportunities available to the defendant to discover the information sought by deposition. However, this
prohibition against the taking of depositions shall not be applicable if following the furnishing of discovery by the
defendant the state then takes the statement of a listed defense witness pursuant to section 27.04, Florida Statutes.

(2) Transcripts.​
No transcript of a deposition for which a county may be obligated to expend funds shall be
ordered by a party unless it is:
(A) agreed between the state and any defendant that the deposition should be transcribed and a written
agreement certifying that the deposed witness is material or specifying other good cause is filed with the court or
(B) ordered by the court on a showing that the deposed witness is material or on showing of good cause.
This rule shall not apply to applications for reimbursement of costs pursuant to section 939.06, Florida Statutes, and
article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution.

(3) Location of Deposition.​
Depositions of witnesses residing in the county in which the trial is to take place shall
be taken in the building in which the trial shall be held, such other location as is agreed on by the parties, or a location
designated by the court. Depositions of witnesses residing outside the county in which the trial is to take place shall be
taken in a court reporter’s office in the county or state in which the witness resides, such other location as is agreed on
by the parties, or a location designated by the court.

(4) Depositions of Sensitive Witnesses.​
Depositions of children under the age of 16 shall be videotaped unless
otherwise ordered by the court. The court may order the videotaping of a deposition or the taking of a deposition of a
witness with fragile emotional strength to be in the presence of the trial judge or a special magistrate.

(5) Depositions of Law Enforcement Officers.​
Subject to the general provisions of subdivision (h)(1), law
enforcement officers shall appear for deposition, without subpoena, upon written notice of taking deposition
delivered at the address of the law enforcement agency or department, or an address designated by the law enforcement
agency or department, five days prior to the date of the deposition. Law enforcement officers who fail to
appear for deposition after being served notice are subject to contempt proceedings.

(6) Witness Coordinating Office/Notice of Taking Deposition.​
If a witness coordinating office has been
established in the jurisdiction pursuant to applicable Florida Statutes, the deposition of any witness should be
coordinated through that office. The witness coordinating office should attempt to schedule the depositions of a
witness at a time and location convenient for the witness and acceptable to the parties.

(7) Defendant’s Physical Presence.​
A defendant shall not be physically present at a deposition except on
stipulation of the parties or as provided by this rule. The court may order the physical presence of the defendant on a
showing of good cause. The court may consider (A) the need for the physical presence of the defendant to obtain
effective discovery, (B) the intimidating effect of the defendant’s presence on the witness, if any, (C) any cost or
inconvenience which may result, and (D) any alternative electronic or audio/visual means available.

(8) Telephonic Statements.​
On stipulation of the parties and the consent of the witness, the statement of a law
enforcement officer may be taken by telephone in lieu of the deposition of the officer. In such case, the officer need
not be under oath. The statement, however, shall be recorded and may be used for impeachment at trial as a prior
inconsistent statement pursuant to the Florida Evidence Code.

(i) Investigations Not to Be Impeded.​
Except as is otherwise provided as to matters not subject to disclosure or
restricted by protective orders, neither the counsel for the parties nor other prosecution or defense personnel shall
advise persons having relevant material or information (except the defendant) to refrain from discussing the case
with opposing counsel or showing opposing counsel any relevant material, nor shall they otherwise impede opposing
counsel’s investigation of the case.

(j) Continuing Duty to Disclose.​
If, subsequent to compliance with the rules, a party discovers additional
witnesses or material that the party would have been under a duty to disclose or produce at the time of the previous
compliance, the party shall promptly disclose or produce the witnesses or material in the same manner as required
under these rules for initial discovery.

(k) Court May Alter Times.​
The court may alter the times for compliance with any discovery under these rules
on good cause shown.

(​
l) Protective Orders.
(1) Motion to Restrict Disclosure of Matters.
On a showing of good cause, the court shall at any time
order that specified disclosures be restricted, deferred, or exempted from discovery, that certain matters not be
inquired into, that the scope of the deposition be limited to certain matters, that a deposition be sealed and after
being sealed be opened only by order of the court, or make such other order as is appropriate to protect a witness
from harassment, unnecessary inconvenience, or invasion of privacy, including prohibiting the taking of a
deposition. All material and information to which a party is entitled, however, must be disclosed in time to permit
the party to make beneficial use of it.

(2) Motion to Terminate or Limit Examination.​
At any time during the taking of a deposition, on motion of
a party or of the deponent, and upon a showing that the examination is being conducted in bad faith or in such
manner as to unreasonably annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party, the court in which the action is
pending or the circuit court where the deposition is being taken may (1) terminate the deposition, (2) limit the scope
and manner of the taking of the deposition, (3) limit the time of the deposition, (4) continue the deposition to a later
time, (5) order the deposition to be taken in open court, and, in addition, may (6) impose any sanction authorized by
this rule. If the order terminates the deposition, it shall be resumed thereafter only upon the order of the court in
which the action is pending. Upon demand of any party or deponent, the taking of the deposition shall be suspended
for the time necessary to make a motion for an order.

(m) In Camera and Ex Parte Proceedings.​
(1) Any person may move for an order denying or regulating disclosure of sensitive matters. The court may
consider the matters contained in the motion in camera.
(2) Upon request, the court shall allow the defendant to make an ex parte showing of good cause for taking the
deposition of a Category B witness.
(3) A record shall be made of proceedings authorized under this subdivision. If the court enters an order granting
relief after an in camera inspection or ex parte showing, the entire record of the proceeding shall be sealed and preserved
and be made available to the appellate court in the event of an appeal.​
(n) Sanctions.​
(1) If, at any time during the course of the proceedings, it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has
failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or with an order issued pursuant to an applicable discovery rule,
the court may order the party to comply with the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed or
produced, grant a continuance, grant a mistrial, prohibit the party from calling a witness not disclosed or introducing
in evidence the material not disclosed, or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.
(2) Willful violation by counsel or a party not represented by counsel of an applicable discovery rule, or an
order issued pursuant thereto, shall subject counsel or the unrepresented party to appropriate sanctions by the court.
The sanctions may include, but are not limited to, contempt proceedings against the attorney or unrepresented party,
as well as the assessment of costs incurred by the opposing party, when appropriate.
(3) Every request for discovery or response or objection, including a notice of deposition made by a party
represented by an attorney, shall be signed by at least 1 attorney of record in the attorney’s individual name, whose
address shall be stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall sign the request, response, or objection
and list his or her address. The signature of the attorney or party constitutes a certification that the signer has read
the request, response, or objection and that to the best of the signer’s knowledge, information, or belief formed after
a reasonable inquiry it is:
(A) consistent with these rules and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension,
modification, or reversal of existing law;
(B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless
increase in the cost of litigation; and
(C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case and the importance of
the issues at stake in the litigation.
If a request, response, or objection is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission
is called to the attention of the party making the request, response, or objection, and a party shall not be obligated to
take any action with respect to it until it is signed.
If a certification is made in violation of this rule, the court, on motion or on its own initiative, shall impose on
the person who made the certification, the firm or agency with which the person is affiliated, the party on whose
behalf the request, response, or objection is made, or any or all of the above an appropriate sanction, which may
include an order to pay the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the violation, including a
reasonable attorney’s fee.​
(o) Costs of Indigents.​
After a defendant is adjudged insolvent, the reasonable costs incurred in the operation of
these rules shall be taxed as costs against the state.

(p) Pretrial Conference.​
(1) The trial court may hold 1 or more pretrial conferences, with trial counsel present, to consider such​
matters as will
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
2,541
Total visitors
2,678

Forum statistics

Threads
601,981
Messages
18,132,792
Members
231,203
Latest member
yoshibee
Back
Top