Nosey Parker
A Brit in Canada
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,335
- Reaction score
- 25
Oops, you beat me to it, Marina.
Things must be sloooooooooooooooow on the "Casey is Innocent Tipline".
Didn't JB already request this fingerprint evidence on prior occasions? Why hasn't the State turned over the information as ordered by the court? IIRC, the State had 20days to turn this over. The 20 days is up and yet JB has to file yet another motion for the same stuff?
JG gave LE a copy of his DNA report. JB gets a copy. Plain and simple. It does not matter what he wants it for, or if it will ever be introduced at trial, he is entitled to it. The State is delaying the production of evidence.
I know everyone thinks JB is a scoundrel, but I don't. He is doing his job.
Didn't JB already request this fingerprint evidence on prior occasions? Why hasn't the State turned over the information as ordered by the court? IIRC, the State had 20days to turn this over. The 20 days is up and yet JB has to file yet another motion for the same stuff?
JG gave LE a copy of his DNA report. JB gets a copy. Plain and simple. It does not matter what he wants it for, or if it will ever be introduced at trial, he is entitled to it. The State is delaying the production of evidence.
I know everyone thinks JB is a scoundrel, but I don't. He is doing his job.
A prime example is look at the way they made Mark Fuhrman look in OJ's trial. I, myself, was embarassed for him. The prosecuting team was made to look like fools. The defense's experts tore the prosecution apart, they created loopholes, and in turn presented proof of reasonable doubt. Remember, we are all only human, therefore we make mistakes, no matter how miniscule. The defense might only need a microscopic miniscule minor mistake to use against the prosecution...therefore creating reasonable doubt.
I find this odd for multiple reasons. One being that GA said they had a copy of the paternity test that JG gave them. Why not use that copy? It belongs to Casey.
Another thought came to me also. What if it was JG's laundry bag Caylee was in? What if Casey stole it and used it?
She did shower there that morning, out of the blue!!
What I see is that KC has a right to a speedy trial. JB is going to argue that KC's right to a speedy trial was denied because he couldn't get discovery in a timely manner. Does that make sense.
The pings don't bolster JG's account of that shower. It shows here there at something like 10:30 like he said but then the pings show her leaving and going to AL's area and then to Blanchard park. She returns later. This doesn't fit the story he told of her coming there and staying til after his roommate comes home and they all hang out til 1 or 2. Of course he threw in that she left the shower door open or something, almost seemingly covering for her that all was normal.
If I recall correctly.
Just an aside.
The pings don't bolster JG's account of that shower. It shows here there at something like 10:30 like he said but then the pings show her leaving and going to AL's area and then to Blanchard park. She returns later. This doesn't fit the story he told of her coming there and staying til after his roommate comes home and they all hang out til 1 or 2. Of course he through in that she left the shower door open or something, almost seemingly covering for her that all was normal.
If I recall correctly.
Just an aside.
Lee didn't plant evidence, he concealed evidence. He was seen picking up and concealing an acrylic finger nail in the foyer of Spector's mansion. The judge concluded that Lee hid or destroyed evidence from Lana's death scene.
I just don't get it.
What possible use is the paternity test? She did it because she's promiscuous and don't know who the father is?
She did shower there that morning, out of the blue!!
ohhh, I didn't know that. There's still a possibility that she may have stolen a laundry bag from his house, though, right?
I may be psyching myself out here, but in the very beginning of this case, I vaugely remember someone mentioning KC doing laundry somewhere. Anyone remember this, or am I imaginaing things? I wonder if she might have taken a laundry bag from that person, if in fact that did occur. On the other hand, she did have laundry detergent in her trunk, so she likely had other laundry supplies with her-including a laundry bag. Just throwing stuff out there...
I agree. It's the first thing I thought of when I read the docs. I was amazed at much hair was found after Lee examined the trunk. Not only the amount but where it was found...the pizza box, an empty soda bottle?
I would expect CSI to be especially vigilant when looking for evidence on these items. It seems doubtful to me that they would miss a hair.
I can't wait to see who they belong too. Probably TL, JG, AH, and an unknown dead person as evidenced by the death band found at the root end!
All this from the lawyer who argued against the State's Motion for a Gag Order on this case.
A lawyer, who when told he can have access to the crime scene(after whining he couldn't get on) said "No Thanks" and now has a motion filed against the land owner because he want's access to the crime scene.
Is this inexperience, stupidity, PR stunt.? Whatever the reason for all this Mr Baez comes across as a lawyer in over his head and it seems has become too emotional..JMO
He should not be allowed to be an expert witness.
I never heard that Broderick. I wonder why he would say that. Maybe he didn't know she left and came back. Didn't he leave her there at some point 'til the roomate came home? Maybe thought she was there the whole time and had no reason to question it??