One thing that is confusing to me, in reading the docs. Kim admits that she was there to paint Crystal in a better light, to improve her image & her reputation, which had been tarnished in the media. She appeared on t.v. and in interviews and told certain things, in order to dispel these "rumors." She claims that some of these truths did not come to light until later, but I am pretty sure that she knew the truth while she was sitting there being interviewed. So how does this make her out to be a hero? She is admitting to lying to save Crystal's reputation. She denied that Crystal took drugs, and now claims that her addiction to them is the reason she never filed for a modification of child support or for custody.
I am aware that most lawyers are well trained in the art of twisting words to suit their own purpose, and hers seems to be to maintain her own reputation, at the same time she throws her former client to the wolves. She seems to me to have mastered that art very well. I'm disappointed in her as much as I am finding out these facts which she has revealed at great length.
I would have hated to see an attorney be suspended as a member of the bar, but at the same time, I am just stunned with the sheer volume of these documents. Good grief, did it really require all that to save her license???
JMHO BBM