Again, who leaves their keys in plain view in an unlocked truck, especially a pair of professional thieves? It just doesn't make sense! ?
I don't know about this. If you hit a side window with a "safety hammer" that is designed to break a window in the case of going through ice, it shatters into a million pieces. I'm surprised that the passenger window didn't do this. Has Mythbusters tested this ?
And this is why I could never be a lawyer. This point didn't even occur to me.
I am, however, insanely curious about what DM's lawyers WILL ask.
What time was Tim and DM talking when they walked up the driveway? Sounds like MS turned it off after.
MOO
Plus the dog was most likely in the Yukon, while DM and MS were at the Bosmas.In fairness, if you know the area, you wouldn't be surprised. It is an extremely rural area, and on top of that, the Yukon was allegedly in a laneway/field according to the neighbour. There is not much around. That Yukon wasn't going anywhere.
Again, who leaves their keys in plain view in an unlocked truck, especially a pair of professional thieves? It just doesn't make sense! Smich didn't say why aren't you taking your keys? Millard just assumed he saw that he put them in the cupholder? These guys had been planning this for days, Millard even going "Mission Prep" in Kitchener days before, and then he's not going to tell Smich the plan? Not likely.
I really don't know what to think right now. I do find it rather curious that MS is quite adamant about being shocked that night, due to none of his and DM's previous crimes having ever involved physically harming anyone. Which of course brings us to his charge in the LB case.
IF he's being honest about what happened that night, does this mean he had nothing to do with LB's murder either? If not, what in the world is the evidence LE has against him that brought the charge? Boy, this testimony just generates more questions.
I really don't know what to think right now. I do find it rather curious that MS is quite adamant about being shocked that night, due to none of his and DM's previous crimes having ever involved physically harming anyone. Which of course brings us to his charge in the LB case.
IF he's being honest about what happened that night, does this mean he had nothing to do with LB's murder either? If not, what in the world is the evidence LE has against him that brought the charge? Boy, this testimony just generates more questions.
It was being guarded by Pedo the dog too.In fairness, if you know the area, you wouldn't be surprised. It is an extremely rural area, and on top of that, the Yukon was allegedly in a laneway/field according to the neighbour. There is not much around. That Yukon wasn't going anywhere.
I don't know about this. If you hit a side window with a "safety hammer" that is designed to break a window in the case of going through ice, it shatters into a million pieces. I'm surprised that the passenger window didn't do this. Has Mythbusters tested this ?
Many of the windows were tinted in the Yukon, and depending on what angle it was parked, he may have not noticed there was no one there. I believe as CN would say it was getting dark (dawn).
All holes in his story will be explored by the crown, and DM's defence team.
MOO
I don't know about this. If you hit a side window with a "safety hammer" that is designed to break a window in the case of going through ice, it shatters into a million pieces. I'm surprised that the passenger window didn't do this. Has Mythbusters tested this ?
Legal question: can Dungey represent Smich in the Laura Babcock murder as well?
To be fair... not sure where you live, andreww, but I am pretty rural also and always leave my keys in my car.
I do get the impression that Smich will be angling towards Millard leaving him out of the plan - already we have heard that he wasn't privy to the calls with truck owners.