Low blow but totally in line with what most of us have thought at some point.
He's talking about what Millard didn't do in the immediate aftermath. Not a jab, IMO.
Low blow but totally in line with what most of us have thought at some point.
Doesn't this also show that he didn't have a plan in place to frame MS for a murder? Why would he be bouncing ideas off of his GF for a frame up (that didn't happen in the end, no one followed through with his ideas) if he already had a plan ready made to frame MS for the impromptu murder?
I don't get this sentence/scenario. Who is the I in the sentence? MS himself, He? It seemed to not make sense in the letter either. CN must have also scratched her head a bit trying to unravel it.Millard also presents a scenario in which he is in danger from Smich and "his boys." "I need this kind of help to win this," Millard writes.
by Adam Carter 11:15 AM
This is the lawyer where Millard suggests maybe Smich and "his boys" were "involved with the dead guy or his wife."
by Adam Carter 11:16 AM
"What is certain is [Smich] told [Michalski] that I wasn't there," Millard writes.
by Adam Carter 11:16 AM
Isn't Smitch actually charged with breaching the order not to communicate with someone on his do not contact list? Where is the evidence of that? I'd love to see what he wrote to Marlena!
Isn't Smitch actually charged with breaching the order not to communicate with someone on his do not contact list? Where is the evidence of that? I'd love to see what he wrote to Marlena!
Lisa Hepfner ‏@HefCHCHNews 1m1 minute ago
Millard looking down, taking notes.
I don't get this sentence/scenario. Who is the I in the sentence? MS himself, He? It seemed to not make sense in the letter either. CN must have also scratched her head a bit trying to unravel it.