- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 39,332
- Reaction score
- 117,401
I'm disagreeing with your statement that
Although in this case, it's next to impossible to imagine a scenario in which he wasn't forcibly confined so it's kind of a moot point.
Moot in your opinion, but the discussion may be of interest to others who have presented different scenarios in the past and are not so convinced of the accused being guilty of either premeditation or FC.
FWIW, I believe they are guilty of first degree based on FC AND premeditation. Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been ... IF the jury did not find premeditation and did not find forcible confinement, then it would not be first degree murder.
premeditation and forcible confinement > guilty of 1st degree
premeditation only > guilty of 1st degree
forcible confinement only > guilty of 1st degree
no premeditation and no forcible confinement > not guilty of 1st degree but guilty of 2nd degree
LOL, I guess I'm not the greatest wordsmith. If I didn't make myself clear this time, I give.